安装 Steam
登录
|
语言
繁體中文（繁体中文）
日本語（日语）
한국어（韩语）
ไทย（泰语）
български（保加利亚语）
Čeština（捷克语）
Dansk（丹麦语）
Deutsch（德语）
English（英语）
Español-España（西班牙语 - 西班牙）
Español - Latinoamérica（西班牙语 - 拉丁美洲）
Ελληνικά（希腊语）
Français（法语）
Italiano（意大利语）
Bahasa Indonesia（印度尼西亚语）
Magyar（匈牙利语）
Nederlands（荷兰语）
Norsk（挪威语）
Polski（波兰语）
Português（葡萄牙语 - 葡萄牙）
Português-Brasil（葡萄牙语 - 巴西）
Română（罗马尼亚语）
Русский（俄语）
Suomi（芬兰语）
Svenska（瑞典语）
Türkçe（土耳其语）
Tiếng Việt（越南语）
Українська（乌克兰语）
报告翻译问题
该主题的作者已标记一个回帖作为问题的解答。
讨论规则及指引
举报此帖
I believe in certain standards. You don't. You folks are in favor of everything goes. I'm not. And that really seems to bug you. Why is that? Do you feel like I'm taking away your freedom? You don't believe that people should be protected from scams?
Valve seems not to care about all these types of games on their store, why should we.
This, many gamers don't read or understand what early access is and get angry when the game they bought doesn't work too well. I remember one of the first games to release on EA, ARM 3.
People complained to high heaven how this game was a scam, threatening to sue to the developers, threatening to sue valve and all that nonsense. Many even claimed not knowing it was a early access beta despite the store page warning of such.
Even now over on the cyberpunk forums, people claiming cyberpunk is a scam.
So do I. One of them being that people take responsibility for their own decisions. Early Access games are clearly marketed as unfinished games, there are reviews and a game hub full of information. When people consciously make the decision to purchase an unfinished game, I expect them to own up to that decision. I also expect them to manage their expectations. If it wasn't their cup of tea, they can simply refund the game if eligible, or keep it around.
I've purchased various Early Access games and all were good purchases. Heck, some of them were in their Early Access state a much more polished game than many games that released directly as "finished" (Look at Cyberpunk currently). I steer clear of the ones that look like a trainwreck, I have games on my wishlist that got out of Early Access years ago and still aren't up to par for me.
You focus too much on the label (early access) and too little on the content. I've always highlighted the Early Access period of games like Slay the Spire and Streets of Rogue. Both did regular game updates, but more importantly news updates. They communicated well with the players. You knew exactly where they were in the process and where they aimed to go.
You got burned twice, which is a shame, but it might simply be because you picked two bad actors. And now you want to condemn the whole program, even though that program has been around for nearly 10 years and produced many succesful games.
I'm not. there are various things in the industries, like lootboxes and certain types of microtransactions, that I severely dislike. Yet others do like it.
I believe in choice, even if they're things that I don't like. People who aren't me exist, why should they be limited in purchasing things they like simply because I don't?
People throw the word "scam" around so much, it has lost its meaning. There isn't an actual scam in Early Access games. You get what you purchase, an unfinished games. Anything beyond that, the "promises", is not part of the deal. People who purchase a game on promises are only fooling themselves, in a way they "scam" themselves.
There may be the sentiment that something feels like a scam, that doesn't make it one, though. Besides, game creators like Peter Molyneux have been doing the "I promise but fail to deliver" part for decades now, even longer than Early Access is around. It's inherent to a creative industry.
I agree with Crazy Tiger on this one, what other people do with their money is not of my concern or problem. People on steam know steams 2 hour refund time, many choose to ignore this and then blame everyone else apart from themselves.
Sorry could not find that post.