Steam 설치
로그인
|
언어
简体中文(중국어 간체)
繁體中文(중국어 번체)
日本語(일본어)
ไทย(태국어)
Български(불가리아어)
Čeština(체코어)
Dansk(덴마크어)
Deutsch(독일어)
English(영어)
Español - España(스페인어 - 스페인)
Español - Latinoamérica(스페인어 - 중남미)
Ελληνικά(그리스어)
Français(프랑스어)
Italiano(이탈리아어)
Bahasa Indonesia(인도네시아어)
Magyar(헝가리어)
Nederlands(네덜란드어)
Norsk(노르웨이어)
Polski(폴란드어)
Português(포르투갈어 - 포르투갈)
Português - Brasil(포르투갈어 - 브라질)
Română(루마니아어)
Русский(러시아어)
Suomi(핀란드어)
Svenska(스웨덴어)
Türkçe(튀르키예어)
Tiếng Việt(베트남어)
Українська(우크라이나어)
번역 관련 문제 보고
Check the Home tab in your library or on the Store page.
Some DLC are free some are extra.
They’re asking about what a developer need pay.
No since they are not registered as a new AppID but rather as a new DepotID
The Steam Direct $100 fee only goes down for registering actual Applications (with a completely new AppID)
Source: https://partner.steamgames.com/doc/store/application/dlc
Referenced "Depot Documentation": https://partner.steamgames.com/doc/store/application/depots
So @Topic: No it does not cost you extra $100 to release a DLC. You simply update the file-pool of your base game and create a new depot for a DLC that should be buyable. Then you link your desired DLC files with said depot and there you go
Simple, if it become a release then it would require the same procedures as a nerw release, because it is.
If Devs decide to include the stabdalone files in the download pool of their initial release then it is a DLC and therefore free to publish. For example Call of Duty Black Ops 3 has several Multiplayer Kits as DLCs while the multiplayer itself is a DLC as well but it is standalone so you either launch the singleplayer game or you launch the multiplayer
If devs want it as the actual standalone then they will need to introduce a new game which then will need a new publishing fee to be paid