Install Steam
login
|
language
简体中文 (Simplified Chinese)
繁體中文 (Traditional Chinese)
日本語 (Japanese)
한국어 (Korean)
ไทย (Thai)
Български (Bulgarian)
Čeština (Czech)
Dansk (Danish)
Deutsch (German)
Español - España (Spanish - Spain)
Español - Latinoamérica (Spanish - Latin America)
Ελληνικά (Greek)
Français (French)
Italiano (Italian)
Bahasa Indonesia (Indonesian)
Magyar (Hungarian)
Nederlands (Dutch)
Norsk (Norwegian)
Polski (Polish)
Português (Portuguese - Portugal)
Português - Brasil (Portuguese - Brazil)
Română (Romanian)
Русский (Russian)
Suomi (Finnish)
Svenska (Swedish)
Türkçe (Turkish)
Tiếng Việt (Vietnamese)
Українська (Ukrainian)
Report a translation problem
And Binary Domain only cost me $5 I think I have done 3 playthroughs.
The difference between a 2 10 year old game and a 20 year old one is FAR bigger then a modern game and a 10 year old one.
Hell games in the last 5 years all have basically the same requirements (I have had the same machine that entire time and been able to play all the games comfortably), compare that to 20 years ago where every 2 years you would need to upgrade to continue to play the new games.
And the objective improvements are pretty much only in graphics.
Else it's just game design and usability, which can be a hit and miss. For example I can't name one Tetris version that really moved the needle on the original, but a numbe of total failures. On the other hand you have seen with Yooka-Laylee that staying true to the original formula of platformers is a mixed boat at best. And then you have franchises where older and newer installments are equally viable for best-of lists, depending on what you like.
Gaming history is litered with this. It's what fully 70% of the titles for most systems are basically forgetabble if not terrible games. Remember when 2d fighters were all the rage and every game was trrying to be the next streetfighter or MK?
and while i wouldnt pay 60€ for a very short old game , if its something great like sims 3 , an open world Game like Skyrim or something else , if the game gives me 50-200 hours of fun , i played Sonic Forces for 24 Hours ( and i beat it multiple times ) i still think the money was spent was worth it , so if a game manages to get twice the playtime of forces while being either the same or a slightly lower price why not ?
20 dollars is to much to spend on a game? Did I read that right?
For some people it is. Remember there are literally hundreds of good games. Plenty of people have enough games they would happily replay to not really feel a need to purchase new games unless they are at a cheap price such as $5-10. Maybe not all games will get to that price point but there will likely be plenty of good ones that will.
Few people will ever buy 90% of even good games simply because they don't need to and have other expenses.
Me I find plenty of games worth spending $20, $40 even $60 on, but even for me there are games that aren't worth that price and I'll wait for them to get to $5 before purchasing.
Yes you did. Strangely enough, Hell I can't even remembver paying $15 for a single game. Well not since the Warcraft 3 Battle chest. Go fig neh?
As Darren says. Some of us have other expenses and really being a penny pincher just means games have to really work to pry the money from my claws.
Some game just forgotten like that.
Yes it sells but ofc it'll be forgotten overtime.
Active publisher will always change the price overtime on specific year .
But as long it sells the same amount each sale it won't change.
I remember fall out came out 60 bucks.
Now it's 30. same goes to doom.
There's also stuff i noticed like dangan ronpa, it was around 30 price launch then drop to 20.
Theres no incentive to lower the base prices because of the frequency of Steam Sales, and how the Steam pricing structure works. THey get a certain cut no matter how you buy. Copies that are sold on sale get the developer only a sliver of profit if any. If they lowered the base price by more than it sits now, they would likely end up paying Steam for every copy sold on sale.
There are two things we know from forums:
1) Companies are greedy and will do anything to increase profits.
2) Lowering prices would increase their profits (a claim that even the OP makes).
By not lowering their prices, Activision are giving up profits. If they were truly greedy they would lower their prices and make so much more money than they are now. By keeping prices high they are signalling to consumers that they are not as obsessed with profits like the more greedy companies.
(Once again, this is forum logic.)
How, exactly, does this happen? The only possible case I can see for it is an online-only game where the servers shut down. I have never heard of a game that just suddenly stops working one day. I own thirty-plus year old games that still run perfectly fine.
Id prefer to forget this era.
I guess you never had Starforce DRM games broken by Win 64 bit OSes, or games that don't work in 'new' OSes. There are games on Steam that don't run in Windows 10.
People worry about Denuvo shutting down and taking games with it. Some people won't buy Denuvo DRMed games.
Steam could get shut down. There was another site Desura that went down and people can't access those games. I purchased games off another digital store and lost games, I have a game on Origin that was shut down.
Hell I suspect WinBox will be a thing soon enough.