Install Steam
login
|
language
简体中文 (Simplified Chinese)
繁體中文 (Traditional Chinese)
日本語 (Japanese)
한국어 (Korean)
ไทย (Thai)
Български (Bulgarian)
Čeština (Czech)
Dansk (Danish)
Deutsch (German)
Español - España (Spanish - Spain)
Español - Latinoamérica (Spanish - Latin America)
Ελληνικά (Greek)
Français (French)
Italiano (Italian)
Bahasa Indonesia (Indonesian)
Magyar (Hungarian)
Nederlands (Dutch)
Norsk (Norwegian)
Polski (Polish)
Português (Portuguese - Portugal)
Português - Brasil (Portuguese - Brazil)
Română (Romanian)
Русский (Russian)
Suomi (Finnish)
Svenska (Swedish)
Türkçe (Turkish)
Tiếng Việt (Vietnamese)
Українська (Ukrainian)
Report a translation problem
P.S. Yeah, you don't see Windows XP at stats, because is not possible launch the client. What clever move!
You make wrong question. Right question is "Why Valve broken down a workable client?"
I know and use. The knife at back to Windows XP users from Valve only consolidated my decision that I have done at 2016.
"The newest features in Steam rely on an embedded version of Google Chrome, which no longer functions on older versions of Windows. In addition, future versions of Steam will require Windows feature and security updates only present in Windows 7 and above."
In the months leading up to XP support ending 0.46% of users were running XP. I know because I was checking out the stats https://store.steampowered.com/hwsurvey/Steam-Hardware-Software-Survey-Welcome-to-Steam when the handful of XP users were trying to kick up a fuss before support ended.
It's a very old OS that enjoyed support for a very long time. And I have to imagine that the 0.46% of XP users weren't coming close to 0.46% of Steam revenue seeing as how XP systems are usually pretty old and unable to address sufficient amounts of RAM for modern games demands, not to mention not being able to execute games requiring 64bit suppot. And if you can't afford to upgrade you probably can't afford to buy games. And buying games ten years ago never guaranteed you perpetual support.
MS publishes one security patch for XP in years doesn't validate your argument. It's an extraordinary exception to their end of support for XP policy. Not evidence of XP relevance in gaming. Who are you trying to kid man?
1. Switch to GOG for their sipported games and keep XP
2. Get a more recent version of Windows, at least Windows 7 or newer, though 7 will likely only be supported by Steam for a few more years.
3. Switch to a current Linux distro, which is free, and use Steamplay Proton to play your library of games.
You are not right fully about RAM. It's enough for many games. Also i.e. same browser works better and use less RAM. About money quote: It's incorrect opinion. I have a machine with Windows 7 also, but I really can not spend money at Steam but in other place.
Game developers spent time and money to support Windows XP, but players can't play if this game in Steam. The main problem is "I spent money, but can't play with pleasure (should make migration)."
Your games will actually run better.
XP games will run just fine on Windows 7, in fact even better than they did on XP.
"I refuse to update MY system. Valve should update it for me."