Install Steam
login
|
language
简体中文 (Simplified Chinese)
繁體中文 (Traditional Chinese)
日本語 (Japanese)
한국어 (Korean)
ไทย (Thai)
Български (Bulgarian)
Čeština (Czech)
Dansk (Danish)
Deutsch (German)
Español - España (Spanish - Spain)
Español - Latinoamérica (Spanish - Latin America)
Ελληνικά (Greek)
Français (French)
Italiano (Italian)
Bahasa Indonesia (Indonesian)
Magyar (Hungarian)
Nederlands (Dutch)
Norsk (Norwegian)
Polski (Polish)
Português (Portuguese - Portugal)
Português - Brasil (Portuguese - Brazil)
Română (Romanian)
Русский (Russian)
Suomi (Finnish)
Svenska (Swedish)
Türkçe (Turkish)
Tiếng Việt (Vietnamese)
Українська (Ukrainian)
Report a translation problem
then yes
these are the guidelines for reviews as well, as you can see, spoilers are not mentioned so you should be free to spoil whatever ever you want in a review.
Uhm, no? Even if not outright mentioned, that falls under the standard netiquette.
You don't need that in reviews of a game. Those tags are generally for normal discussion on the discussion board.
Review is a review of the game. That includes all part of the game.
It's not grounds to get a review "banned" per se.
Netiquette is all fine and dandy, however.
I would say: if your 'review' goes into such detail on things that would absolutely ruin a game for someone due to spoiling it? Put spoiler tags VERY PROMINENTLY on the top of the review. Don't 'retell the story' in a review, be vague for details, basically.
Anything else should be considered 'comments' and kept in the forum for such discussions.
throwing words around as some sort of scare tactic like netiquette (like oh.. you don't know what standard netiquette is??)
but do link me to valves netiquette then, if the kb article doesn't mention it, i presume it is mentioned in this hidden document (lets call it hidden netiquette).
but it has become an occuring theme to just post stuff as if that means that person is right just because they said so.
also just because you don't like "spoilers" does not mean everyone on steam has the same subjective opinion about it as you do, so don't impose your opinions onto others as if you represent the entire community.
I could very well be wrong in thinking it is allowed as nothing has ever indicated otherwise to me but if such statements from either valve or the moderator staff were to present themselves, i guess i would be that much wiser.
but all i got from this so far is, and let me put into an example for you:
can i watch a horror movie while playing barbies dream house? no, because it is not standard netiquette.
Luckily for the moderators, they have the ability to delete reviews.
So then they can sleep well at night x)
If you consider that to be too much for you, perhaps you shouldn't be reviewing games, and maybe want to review how good you are at being human. because ... my impression is that you're pretty crap at it.
put on a tinfoil hat and hide under your bed until you can buy the game yourself.
keep in mind, nobody is forcing you to read the reviews. The OP did not ask whether or not you were a decent person or a jerk, and why you bring both things up is beyond my comprehension as the question the OP asked was whether or not it was allowed.
not whether or not you think the people that do add "spoilers" in reviews are decent or bad people.
but do link the OP something that can confirm it is not allowed, which would be an actual contribution to this topic, rather than your opinions about it.
Since they clearly say "there's nothing in the rules specific about it" one might infer that there is no hard and fast rule.
But socially, the rule is, don't. Because spoilers are a ♥♥♥♥ move.