Install Steam
login
|
language
简体中文 (Simplified Chinese)
繁體中文 (Traditional Chinese)
日本語 (Japanese)
한국어 (Korean)
ไทย (Thai)
Български (Bulgarian)
Čeština (Czech)
Dansk (Danish)
Deutsch (German)
Español - España (Spanish - Spain)
Español - Latinoamérica (Spanish - Latin America)
Ελληνικά (Greek)
Français (French)
Italiano (Italian)
Bahasa Indonesia (Indonesian)
Magyar (Hungarian)
Nederlands (Dutch)
Norsk (Norwegian)
Polski (Polish)
Português (Portuguese - Portugal)
Português - Brasil (Portuguese - Brazil)
Română (Romanian)
Русский (Russian)
Suomi (Finnish)
Svenska (Swedish)
Türkçe (Turkish)
Tiếng Việt (Vietnamese)
Українська (Ukrainian)
Report a translation problem
yea you can overhear 2 dark wizards talking about it in the forbidden forest
one of them was talking about using avada kedavra and the other was saying you need to have both the talent and the intent to use it - and he wasn't sure if the other wizard have what it takes to use it
You need to have intent to actually kill the person. As Alastor said to Harry's class, they could all cast it at him together and it would have been nothing.
you tell that to all the gun nuts in the US
mass shooting is like a national pasttime in the US now, but these gun nuts still cry "but..but.....guns don't kill people bruh!!!"
1) there is some poorly communicated lore why they are worse than regular killing/torture/mind charms, e.g. it affects the soul in a way regular ones don't.
2) it's a story written for children so the entire reasoning was "killing is bad" without thinking about it too much.
Why was it necessary to take the conversation down this path??
We're talking about a fantasy game where go to school to learn how to levitate objects and throw fire from your wand, so you can fight off giant trolls that are wearing armor made from enchanted goblin metal, created by a group of goblins that are trying to take over the world using ancient magic that paintings that can move and talk tell you about.
GTFO out of here with that ♥♥♥♥.
but then why not make the intent unforgivable, rather than the spell? (you know basically use real world definitions for murder, manslaughter, etc.)
like what happens in the harry potter world if you murder someone with a knife or fireball?
You do lose something. It's not tangible, but look at the people who cast these curses in the books and the games. They are shells of their former selves. Complete socio/psychopaths with no empathy.
The game just doesn't have a system to go that deep.
You just go to jail, like irl. Murder is still murder.
Though, the unforgivable curses require you to be so hateful, so rotten inside, that the idea is there is no coming back from that. You really need to want to kill or torture your target to cast these spells.
It's essentially like the dark side of the force in Star Wars.
Avada Kedavra is an instant murder conviction because the motive always is to kill the target. There are no accidents with that spell.
In the states, we call that Man Slaughter.
It's cast many times by all of the Death Eaters. Every time they are casting, it's pretty much exclusively Avada Kadavra.
Like I said in another comment, it's like succumbing to the dark side of the force in Star Wars. The amount of corruption and hatred needed to cast these spells is immense. A good parallel is when Bellatrix killed Sirius. Harry was right there, on the cusp of casting it to kill her, he heard Voldemort's whispers telling him to cast it, but Harry knew better.
This is exactly the same as Palpatine pushing Anakin to do terrible things.