Install Steam
login
|
language
简体中文 (Simplified Chinese)
繁體中文 (Traditional Chinese)
日本語 (Japanese)
한국어 (Korean)
ไทย (Thai)
Български (Bulgarian)
Čeština (Czech)
Dansk (Danish)
Deutsch (German)
Español - España (Spanish - Spain)
Español - Latinoamérica (Spanish - Latin America)
Ελληνικά (Greek)
Français (French)
Italiano (Italian)
Bahasa Indonesia (Indonesian)
Magyar (Hungarian)
Nederlands (Dutch)
Norsk (Norwegian)
Polski (Polish)
Português (Portuguese - Portugal)
Português - Brasil (Portuguese - Brazil)
Română (Romanian)
Русский (Russian)
Suomi (Finnish)
Svenska (Swedish)
Türkçe (Turkish)
Tiếng Việt (Vietnamese)
Українська (Ukrainian)
Report a translation problem
I think it's also a numbers game. There's waaaaay more muggles than there are magic users.
Voldemort didn't attack the school exclusively with magic users. He also used magical creatures, including giants, and dementors.
Dementors, who's very presence alone is enough to suck all sense of hope and happiness out of anyone in the vicinity. That would be instrumental in destroying the muggle's sense of morale on the battlefield.
Again, show evidence that shield charms stop physical, non-magic projectiles. Firearms are mentioned in one of the books. The way its referred to implies that most wizards and witches barely understand the concept of a firearm, yet alone how one works.
Have you ever researched how fast a bullet moves? Even a relatively weak load like a .22 short? Magic is targeted. Once a bullet is actually in motion, I think most wizards in that universe are at a disadvantage.
Good luck doing that from nearly a mile away. Or even being able to envision and cast the spell non-verbally before the trigger has been pulled. No wizard or witch is fast enough to stop anything once a bullet is in flight, any caliber.
Snake Eater reference! I love it. :D
has that been proven in the Wizarding World? (actual question, not as hard core potter fan as I would have liked to be)
though not sure how logic can be imposed on a illogical situation and race
Firearms are heavier and bulkier. Furthermore, they require more maintenance, ammunition and are much louder than a wand. That and Ron would probably have shot his eye out in the first book if they had given him that official Red Ryder, carbine action, two-hundred shot range model air rifle that he had asked for Christmas.
And since the topic is about wizards using guns, I'm sure they could make magic guns and bullets to penetrate magical defenses.
I see no reason why it couldn't. When Dumbledore transmuted the glass shards, he erected a barrier, and the shards transformed as they were passing through it. He didn't have to target them directly.
The problem is we know shield spells can be overwhelmed, so this entirely comes down to the unknown variables of does the velocity and caliber exceed what a shield charm can deflect/absorb.
Not to mention it also comes partially down to the unknowns of how magically reactive the bullet metal is. Lead, Tungsten, and Depleted Uranium all seem suspect how useful magic would be against them.
........................................
Glass is a very bad example since how easy its constituent parts are to manipulate even without magic and glass itself in small pieces is rather easy to change even without magic as well.
You should also take the kind of wand being used in the casting into account. Since we know that depending on its length, flexibility, wood and core, the wand can affect the user's magical abilities in various ways.