Install Steam
login
|
language
简体中文 (Simplified Chinese)
繁體中文 (Traditional Chinese)
日本語 (Japanese)
한국어 (Korean)
ไทย (Thai)
Български (Bulgarian)
Čeština (Czech)
Dansk (Danish)
Deutsch (German)
Español - España (Spanish - Spain)
Español - Latinoamérica (Spanish - Latin America)
Ελληνικά (Greek)
Français (French)
Italiano (Italian)
Bahasa Indonesia (Indonesian)
Magyar (Hungarian)
Nederlands (Dutch)
Norsk (Norwegian)
Polski (Polish)
Português (Portuguese - Portugal)
Português - Brasil (Portuguese - Brazil)
Română (Romanian)
Русский (Russian)
Suomi (Finnish)
Svenska (Swedish)
Türkçe (Turkish)
Tiếng Việt (Vietnamese)
Українська (Ukrainian)
Report a translation problem
I didn't really like it myself, because I looked at some sample screengrabs and could tell there was no continuity with the main series.
So not really surprised this show was declared AU/non-canon.
And I cringed inside every STO episode I played which referenced Discovery.
I considered it ironic that all the effort that Cryptic put into creating Discovery themed content was technically wasted after this decision was made.
But I don't think they can delete that content without seriously messing up the game by deleting gear, ships etc, so we're stuck with that stuff.
Also the tech seemed ahead of what was in the TOS series. Yes there's a difference in special effects over the years as improvements happened for show creation but Star Trek Continues and Enterprise should how to do that properly with canon. Discovery was all over the place like a bull in a china shop. It had some serious potential but feels like it was wasted. Still good in it's own right for those that liked it.
Why would any of those people you mention call themselves or use the term 'incel'... as far as im aware the term and in the manner im using it, is pretty much mostly used by that particular subset of men im having a rant about in my comment, and not people with sexual physical disabilities... but im sure you're grasp of English and the concepts of our language mean you're well aware of what i and the way i used the term meant.
So nice try...
That is exactly what someone with sexual disabilities is.
You are being a horrible and ignorant human being.
You have it reversed. They didn't have the rights to real star trek. STD and all non-trek (made past Enterprise) was legally required to be at least 25% (IIRC) distinct from Real Trek. Hence the new uniforms and new Klingons and new ships and new everything. Hence the pre-pre-prequel setting. Easier to re-make and re-imagine it all.
It's not that it broke cannon and had to be placed in a new universe. It's that it was legally mandated to be a new universe from the jump and thus deliberately broke as much cannon as possible.
The issue is that they kept lying and saying it was the original real timeline. They did this because of monetary greed and creative bankruptcy. And people who are more into politics than Star Trek believed them for reasons that have nothing to do with Star Trek.
Incel seems to be exclusively used as an ad hominem insult by the people who follow a specific internally inconsistent hypocritical fact/truth averse ideology.
The word itself means "involuntary celibate" and thus describes anyone who cannot get laid. Mentally and physically deformed and infirm people very much included.
Still, to paraphrase and sub in the current "issue", everyone with two working brain cells knows what people "incel" refers to, and if those people with slightly working brains ever heard someone call a handicapped person an incel, that someone would rightfully expect to get clipped around the ear.
It has a very specific meaning when used as a slang, and it's not to demean people with disabilities, and I think you very well know that.
Edit: Seems like at least one person doesn't know that. To be expected.
Regardless of all these "problems", I dare say that Strange New Worlds, at least season 1, did a phenomenal job of bringing Star Trek back (and toning some of that stuff down while bringing back the good old themes) into it's proper place, though season 2 wasn't as good imo because of the more serealized episodes, Subspace Rhapsode, and the Lower Decks crossover episode (Gene Roddebberry intially intended ST to have a serious tone and didn't like Tribbles episode. Lowerdecks to an attempt at too much commedy for me). PLEASE NOTE THAT NONE OF THIS IS MY OWN POLITICAL VIEWS, I AM SIMPLY ATTEMTING TO STATE WHAT I SEE STAT TREK AS FROM THE LATE 2010S.
Anyways I'm gonna dip and gtfo cuz I think WW3 is about to start, at least in this comment thread. Anyways according to ST, WW3 starts next year, so I guess this is the precusor lol.