Install Steam
login
|
language
简体中文 (Simplified Chinese)
繁體中文 (Traditional Chinese)
日本語 (Japanese)
한국어 (Korean)
ไทย (Thai)
Български (Bulgarian)
Čeština (Czech)
Dansk (Danish)
Deutsch (German)
Español - España (Spanish - Spain)
Español - Latinoamérica (Spanish - Latin America)
Ελληνικά (Greek)
Français (French)
Italiano (Italian)
Bahasa Indonesia (Indonesian)
Magyar (Hungarian)
Nederlands (Dutch)
Norsk (Norwegian)
Polski (Polish)
Português (Portuguese - Portugal)
Português - Brasil (Portuguese - Brazil)
Română (Romanian)
Русский (Russian)
Suomi (Finnish)
Svenska (Swedish)
Türkçe (Turkish)
Tiếng Việt (Vietnamese)
Українська (Ukrainian)
Report a translation problem
We knew for a while that he wouldn't be back to coding for a while so there should be no surprise here really.
☑ Mark this post as topic answer
If the devs got their PRIORITIES straight the playership wouldn't be tanking. From 14,098 players down to 1,775 in 4 months.
A whole lot of people have been playing DF on and off for many years, getting a couple forts worth of play time after each major update before going off to do other things.
Also, concurrent players means very little in a single player game, even more so one that can be launched in a few seconds, played for a bit, saved and closed, whenever you have some time or idea.
I would even argue that 1.7k concurrent players is a sign that the game is being actively played by more than just a handful of hardcore fans, 14k was just never the sort of number you could envision a game like this having consistently for months anyway.
Dwarf Fortress is Call of Duty 6
In before, "RimWorld is nothing like DF!" Yeah, and Counter-Strike is nothing like Valorant, and DotA is nothing like League of Legends.