Asenna Steam
kirjaudu sisään
|
kieli
简体中文 (yksinkertaistettu kiina)
繁體中文 (perinteinen kiina)
日本語 (japani)
한국어 (korea)
ไทย (thai)
български (bulgaria)
Čeština (tšekki)
Dansk (tanska)
Deutsch (saksa)
English (englanti)
Español – España (espanja – Espanja)
Español – Latinoamérica (espanja – Lat. Am.)
Ελληνικά (kreikka)
Français (ranska)
Italiano (italia)
Bahasa Indonesia (indonesia)
Magyar (unkari)
Nederlands (hollanti)
Norsk (norja)
Polski (puola)
Português (portugali – Portugali)
Português – Brasil (portugali – Brasilia)
Română (romania)
Русский (venäjä)
Svenska (ruotsi)
Türkçe (turkki)
Tiếng Việt (vietnam)
Українська (ukraina)
Ilmoita käännösongelmasta
Artillery's primary uses are forcing light vehicles and infantry to move out of LOS, move to trade, or die. It also lets you win infantry HP races much more easily and smash up cars without committing a direct ground vehicle or infantry team.
As to setup, its the asymmetry of what their doctrine is assuming and what they represent. they are built to slap a tank rush down, but have very poor response to lots of infantry. Your units are hauling a lot of 50-60's equipment around, notably those really awful recoiless rifle jeeps. Unfortunately it seems the unit was never issued the HE rounds that make those useful as a dual purpose gun. your also don't have fully integrated ATGMs for your vehicles, still having the ones that need you to mount a launcher thats stored inside, and yours are far shorter range, you only have mark 1 or 2 dragons, whereas theirs seem to be the improved mark 3.
Your unit was not expected to be in a fight AT ALL, and so it was training the last few drops out of the outdated equipment.
I don't know why you replied to a person who clearly was trolling or can't be reasoned with.
Also, you're really wrong too. Almost none of your equipment is from the 50s, and only so much is from the 60s.
The enemy is clearly using whatever Russian system had the AT-4s (As in the Soviet AT-4s) range, but a bit more effect on target. Could be that platform that was meant to be issued at the company level. Could be Kornet.
The US never adopted something foot mobile with TOW range.