Install Steam
login
|
language
简体中文 (Simplified Chinese)
繁體中文 (Traditional Chinese)
日本語 (Japanese)
한국어 (Korean)
ไทย (Thai)
Български (Bulgarian)
Čeština (Czech)
Dansk (Danish)
Deutsch (German)
Español - España (Spanish - Spain)
Español - Latinoamérica (Spanish - Latin America)
Ελληνικά (Greek)
Français (French)
Italiano (Italian)
Bahasa Indonesia (Indonesian)
Magyar (Hungarian)
Nederlands (Dutch)
Norsk (Norwegian)
Polski (Polish)
Português (Portuguese - Portugal)
Português - Brasil (Portuguese - Brazil)
Română (Romanian)
Русский (Russian)
Suomi (Finnish)
Svenska (Swedish)
Türkçe (Turkish)
Tiếng Việt (Vietnamese)
Українська (Ukrainian)
Report a translation problem
The same guy gave LOU2 a 10/10.
I'm not mad at the 5/10, but his opinion has no value whatsoever.
Keep in mind, these "journalist" also give games like The Last of Us 2 a 8/10. Game journalism is such a joke. It's fine if he truly believes it's a 2/10 but the majority of the people will disagree with this review.
I've noticed IGN and Gamespot share a common complaint with this game
-" It's too difficult and tedious that some parts are unfair"
-"They didn't change anything from the original"
Both are terrible complaints to be have about this game, it sticks to the original, and keeps the challenge. Journalists are shaking right now...
Also: - Too much water
1)Alien Isolation 6/10 "The game is to difficult. Whaa whaaa no baby difficulty."
-"They didn't change anything from the original"
2)TLOU 2 "Masterpiece 10/10" Didn't changed gameplay mechanics what so ever. Everything the same.
IGN is ♥♥♥♥♥♥♥ JOKE