Install Steam
login
|
language
简体中文 (Simplified Chinese)
繁體中文 (Traditional Chinese)
日本語 (Japanese)
한국어 (Korean)
ไทย (Thai)
Български (Bulgarian)
Čeština (Czech)
Dansk (Danish)
Deutsch (German)
Español - España (Spanish - Spain)
Español - Latinoamérica (Spanish - Latin America)
Ελληνικά (Greek)
Français (French)
Italiano (Italian)
Bahasa Indonesia (Indonesian)
Magyar (Hungarian)
Nederlands (Dutch)
Norsk (Norwegian)
Polski (Polish)
Português (Portuguese - Portugal)
Português - Brasil (Portuguese - Brazil)
Română (Romanian)
Русский (Russian)
Suomi (Finnish)
Svenska (Swedish)
Türkçe (Turkish)
Tiếng Việt (Vietnamese)
Українська (Ukrainian)
Report a translation problem
It's worth the price even with the small playerbase.
FACTS (as of 2019-08-09):
- 24-hour peak: 38
- Weekly average: 48
- All-time peak: 814 (July 24, 2019)
I don't think those numbers are accurate my man. As I recall there was some kind of error with steam tracking (~July 24th)that messed with the peak numbers for a bunch of VR games (I assume other games too but I didn't check those) If you take a look at pavlov it's all-time peak is 17,629 which is totally not true.
I use steamdb myself but it's all scraping the same data. If you take a look at the graphs for concurrent players there's a pretty obvious aberration
https://steamdb.info/app/963930/graphs/ <-Contractors
https://steamcharts.com/app/963930 <-Contractors
https://steamdb.info/app/555160/graphs/ <-Pavlov
https://steamcharts.com/app/555160 <-Pavlov
https://steamdb.info/app/620980/graphs/ <-Beat Saber
https://steamcharts.com/app/620980 <-Beat Saber
Always a good idea to take a closer look at single data points like those above and see how they fit into the overall dataset before assuming what you're seeing if factual.