battles 1 vs 1 are necessary

[-Lesziel-]

someone remember rise of incarnates? the game was 2 vs 2, and died a few weeks later, if you only put 3 vs 3 battles this game dies a few weeks later. 1 vs 1 is the solution.

People in fighting games like this do not like to depend on someone else.

I do not say that they remove 3 vs 3, for those that you like, but with 1 vs 1 like in psp, they could keep the game alive longer and l would buy it instantly.

square enix, I noticed this on the rise of incarnates page, they ignored it and the game died at 2 weeks, do not make the same mistake.

[VAEL]

Rise of Incarnates looks cool, I do love the model of a team brawler. ~

*~ Hopefully DISSIDIA can be saved! ~*

[DJukor]

Id like a 1v1 tag team battle mode that also has assists.
Kinda like MVC or DBFZ
And any buffs you use as one character that are normally aoe just work on your entire team and assists and characters you are not using currently don't lose the buff as fast so the current support characters can stay relevant.

In fact having a tag team system whit assists would offset the fact characters have around 8 bravery atacks and only one HP atack.
Because you would pick a tag team that compliments one another for specific situations.
Like have one Zoner One Agresive preasure character and like another character that has good asists.
I imagine all homing projectile characters would make good assists.

[Zajumcskins.army]

People are saying it's not designed for 1v1, well, it's not designed for 3v3 either, not gonna lie the main gamemode itself is plain retarded for soloq since You can farm the weakest and win easily. Parties are more communicative but the problem is still there, i'm surprised core battle isn't a main mode for NT.

[Agad]

Originally posted by Luneth:

First off, you can play 1v1 in lobbies, there just isn't matchmaking for 1v1. You can matchmake as a solo player, but it'll throw you in a team with 2 other randoms. Lobbies can be public as well, like a server list, which is what most PS4 players do.

Secondly, the game is designed around 3v3 anyway, it's not the same as the PSP Dissidia games, it's more about operating as a team to beat out the opposing party and they've simplified some elements because of it being more hectic. 3v3 is more fun imo because team composition can produce more interesting matchups because of the different playstyles. 2 marksmen running interference on the enemy while an assassin moves in quick for the final blow, is a strategy that you couldn't have in 1v1.

If the game was just 1v1, no one would play marksmen characters.

Actually........i play marksmen in 1v1 battles all the time. And I usually win

Since the game is so simplified compared to the psp titles, most classes are pretty easy to master and marksmen can be played at close range despite what i see people do online in ranked (actively running away from the opponent to throw projectiles from afar instead of keeping them at a safe distance with projectiles)

Originally posted by xRainZx:

You mean. Thr game has been out 2 years before console announcement.
And the japanese players are happy with that for 2 whole years.

But it died here almost immediately.....soooooo.......

[DynaUK/TTV]

Originally posted by Agad117:

Originally posted by Luneth:

First off, you can play 1v1 in lobbies, there just isn't matchmaking for 1v1. You can matchmake as a solo player, but it'll throw you in a team with 2 other randoms. Lobbies can be public as well, like a server list, which is what most PS4 players do.

Secondly, the game is designed around 3v3 anyway, it's not the same as the PSP Dissidia games, it's more about operating as a team to beat out the opposing party and they've simplified some elements because of it being more hectic. 3v3 is more fun imo because team composition can produce more interesting matchups because of the different playstyles. 2 marksmen running interference on the enemy while an assassin moves in quick for the final blow, is a strategy that you couldn't have in 1v1.

If the game was just 1v1, no one would play marksmen characters.

Actually........i play marksmen in 1v1 battles all the time. And I usually win

Since the game is so simplified compared to the psp titles, most classes are pretty easy to master and marksmen can be played at close range despite what i see people do online in ranked (actively running away from the opponent to throw projectiles from afar instead of keeping them at a safe distance with projectiles)

Originally posted by xRainZx:

You mean. Thr game has been out 2 years before console announcement.
And the japanese players are happy with that for 2 whole years.

But it died here almost immediately.....soooooo.......

The game isn't dead though, it's never been dead. They wouldn't keep supporting a dead game, a least think about it.

[Agad]

Originally posted by Jebaited:

Originally posted by Agad117:

Actually........i play marksmen in 1v1 battles all the time. And I usually win

Since the game is so simplified compared to the psp titles, most classes are pretty easy to master and marksmen can be played at close range despite what i see people do online in ranked (actively running away from the opponent to throw projectiles from afar instead of keeping them at a safe distance with projectiles)



But it died here almost immediately.....soooooo.......

The game isn't dead though, it's never been dead. They wouldn't keep supporting a dead game, a least think about it.

Tourney scene....dead. Square is trying to revive it by making it free dumbass. You think before you try to correct someone

[Serret]

I must agree that 1v1 should be added at least as a custom battle mode.
You arleady have a 2 v 2 story mode mission. Custom battles should be flexible in regards to player numbers.
1v1 , 2v2 and 3v3
Also several rulesets should be added for ex: sumons allowed y\n.

[Agad]

Originally posted by Serret:

I must agree that 1v1 should be added at least as a custom battle mode.
You arleady have a 2 v 2 story mode mission. Custom battles should be flexible in regards to player numbers.
1v1 , 2v2 and 3v3
Also several rulesets should be added for ex: sumons allowed y\n.

Disable ai partners and you can run any format 1v1, 2v2, 3v1, 1v2 ect.

[hisv]

For p2p to work you need everyone to have a good connection, the game SUCKS when even one person is lagging so yeah, they should have balanced the game for 1v1 if they expected to use p2p.

[MAGA Slayer ⑨]

They are different games, get over it already. Even if they added 1v1 now it will not be balanced by any means.

[Agad]

1v1 works fine though. Actually 2v2 seems to work better than 3v3 and if you don't believe me try it yourself.

People said the same thing about DragonBall Fighterz and now you can select 1v1 or 1v2 and guess what!!!! IT WORKS FINE!!!

Giving your players options never hurt anyone.

[Aria～ムキ]

Just make an custom lobby turn off bots? can 1v1 or 1v2 or 2v2, in there

[Agad]

Originally posted by Aria～ムキ:

Just make an custom lobby turn off bots? can 1v1 or 1v2 or 2v2, in there

I said this earlier but it seems people want 1v1 or 2v2 ranked which is very unlikely.

[Obdilord]

There CAN'T be 1v1. stop asking. Making one would require significant balance changes made purprosely for only that mode and it would conflict with the balance for the 3v3 which is the standard.

This is team based fighting game. Get over it.

[nak]

1v1 is a thing in custom lobby, stop your whining 1v1 isnt needed and would do more damage then good