Insane system requirements??

[Trash Bin]

GTX 1050 for minimum?? God wow

[dokoham]

because 3VS3?

[Trash Bin]

Originally posted by dokoham:

because 3VS3?

I mean look at the other games. They have better graphics and lower system requirements. Like DMC 5 had really good graphics and pretty reasonable requirements. Even Final Fantasy XV had lower system requirements and it's open world.

[icantsee]

upgrade ur potato

[Trash Bin]

Originally posted by LeftUpRightDown:

upgrade ur potato

I'd like to...I'm poor as ♥♥♥♥

[Elaine Marley]

35gigs too so won't be playing immediately as I hoped XD

[Sauron Cat]

If I had been following requirement, I shouldn't even be able to run Jump Force at low graphics.

I can run Jump Force at Medium 1080p 60fps

[Renka]

The requirement is fine

[[VGM] Redbl0odx]

LOL 1050 is a high end card to you? ahahaahahahahaahahaha

[neilencio]

Originally posted by HanB1N:

GTX 1050 for minimum?? God wow

GTX 1050 is pretty much considered low-end for current gen games these days. There's only one card lower than it in the 10 series, the GT 1030, which is on par with Ryzen 3 and Athlon 200ge's APU.

Besides, they have lowered the system requirements. When the store page first came up, the minimum requirements were asking for 3GB GPUs and above, and that was for 30FPS @ 720p. The updated system requirements now only ask for a 2GB card like the GTX 1050, and it's rating it for 60fps @ 720p.

I'm also going to have to disagree with FFXV as an example. That game does not run well on a plain GTX 1050, unless you're willing to deal with low resolution scale (jaggies), and microstutters.

DMC5 is a good example, but then again Capcom's always been good with optimization when it comes to DMC games. Try Monster Hunter World, that game will not run well on a plain GTX 1050.

[Zuranai]

Originally posted by Gargamel Smurf Hunter:

If I had been following requirement, I shouldn't even be able to run Jump Force at low graphics.

I can run Jump Force at Medium 1080p 60fps

Yeah minimum requirements are often not the end all be all.

[p2020s don't make you good]

Originally posted by Cecilia:

Originally posted by HanB1N:

GTX 1050 for minimum?? God wow

GTX 1050 is pretty much considered low-end for current gen games these days. There's only one card lower than it in the 10 series, the GT 1030, which is on par with Ryzen 3 and Athlon 200ge's APU.

Besides, they have lowered the system requirements. When the store page first came up, the minimum requirements were asking for 3GB GPUs and above, and that was for 30FPS @ 720p. The updated system requirements now only ask for a 2GB card like the GTX 1050, and it's rating it for 60fps @ 720p.

I'm also going to have to disagree with FFXV as an example. That game does not run well on a plain GTX 1050, unless you're willing to deal with low resolution scale (jaggies), and microstutters.

DMC5 is a good example, but then again Capcom's always been good with optimization when it comes to DMC games. Try Monster Hunter World, that game will not run well on a plain GTX 1050.

The problem is, these system requirements don't make much sense given the specs of the original PS4, which are significantly weaker than a 1050

[[VGM] Redbl0odx]

I can tell you right now, I have a 1050 in another rig of mine, and the thing can barely play anything modern well. When comparing something on the PS4 which also has a PC release, the 1050 is barely able to keep up even on low.

[Renka]

The 1050 is absolute trash since is release,if you want something pretty good for a low price just pick a 1660ti

[Achiel]

A 1050 is actually a pretty pretty weak card high end card. Do not be fooled.

[Trash Bin]

Originally posted by Achiel:

A 1050 is actually a pretty pretty weak card high end card. Do not be fooled.

Oh ok