安裝 Steam
登入
|
語言
簡體中文
日本語(日文)
한국어(韓文)
ไทย(泰文)
Български(保加利亞文)
Čeština(捷克文)
Dansk(丹麥文)
Deutsch(德文)
English(英文)
Español - España(西班牙文 - 西班牙)
Español - Latinoamérica(西班牙文 - 拉丁美洲)
Ελληνικά(希臘文)
Français(法文)
Italiano(義大利文)
Bahasa Indonesia(印尼語)
Magyar(匈牙利文)
Nederlands(荷蘭文)
Norsk(挪威文)
Polski(波蘭文)
Português(葡萄牙文 - 葡萄牙)
Português - Brasil(葡萄牙文 - 巴西)
Română(羅馬尼亞文)
Русский(俄文)
Suomi(芬蘭文)
Svenska(瑞典文)
Türkçe(土耳其文)
tiếng Việt(越南文)
Українська(烏克蘭文)
回報翻譯問題
>Both have turn based strategic mode and real time tactical battles
>Both are set on the Eastern front during WW2
>Both claim to bring historical realism and accuracy
Of course they are not identical games but they share many key elements.
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=iEI1lwWe6JU
Please link any footage of this game that looks anything like that ^^. Better yet forget that, just show me any SD2 gameplay footage at all that looks like the trailers on store page, then I accept defeat.
If you zoom out same distance form GTMF it will look " fairly static, not dynamic in nature or anywhere near epic in scale" too I bet.
SD2 displays larger scaled fights and the game look much more dynamic if zoomed in.
It’s like complaining why apples aren’t oranges.
So I'm not saying SD2 should be like mius front, I am saying SD2 should be like SD2 trailers.
Zoom out and you show me how moch more dynamic the game look. You also play totaly different scale and will not find yourself zooming in very often because you play on larger maps with more units....whats the point of that nonsense discussion anyway....waste of time