Installer Steam
log på
|
sprog
简体中文 (forenklet kinesisk)
繁體中文 (traditionelt kinesisk)
日本語 (japansk)
한국어 (koreansk)
ไทย (thai)
Български (bulgarsk)
Čeština (tjekkisk)
Deutsch (tysk)
English (engelsk)
Español – España (spansk – Spanien)
Español – Latinoamérica (spansk – Latinamerika)
Ελληνικά (græsk)
Français (fransk)
Italiano (italiensk)
Bahasa indonesia (indonesisk)
Magyar (ungarsk)
Nederlands (hollandsk)
Norsk
Polski (polsk)
Português (portugisisk – Portugal)
Português – Brasil (portugisisk – Brasilien)
Română (rumænsk)
Русский (russisk)
Suomi (finsk)
Svenska (svensk)
Türkçe (tyrkisk)
Tiếng Việt (Vietnamesisk)
Українська (ukrainsk)
Rapporter et oversættelsesproblem
>Both have turn based strategic mode and real time tactical battles
>Both are set on the Eastern front during WW2
>Both claim to bring historical realism and accuracy
Of course they are not identical games but they share many key elements.
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=iEI1lwWe6JU
Please link any footage of this game that looks anything like that ^^. Better yet forget that, just show me any SD2 gameplay footage at all that looks like the trailers on store page, then I accept defeat.
If you zoom out same distance form GTMF it will look " fairly static, not dynamic in nature or anywhere near epic in scale" too I bet.
SD2 displays larger scaled fights and the game look much more dynamic if zoomed in.
It’s like complaining why apples aren’t oranges.
So I'm not saying SD2 should be like mius front, I am saying SD2 should be like SD2 trailers.
Zoom out and you show me how moch more dynamic the game look. You also play totaly different scale and will not find yourself zooming in very often because you play on larger maps with more units....whats the point of that nonsense discussion anyway....waste of time