Install Steam
login
|
language
简体中文 (Simplified Chinese)
繁體中文 (Traditional Chinese)
日本語 (Japanese)
한국어 (Korean)
ไทย (Thai)
Български (Bulgarian)
Čeština (Czech)
Dansk (Danish)
Deutsch (German)
Español - España (Spanish - Spain)
Español - Latinoamérica (Spanish - Latin America)
Ελληνικά (Greek)
Français (French)
Italiano (Italian)
Bahasa Indonesia (Indonesian)
Magyar (Hungarian)
Nederlands (Dutch)
Norsk (Norwegian)
Polski (Polish)
Português (Portuguese - Portugal)
Português - Brasil (Portuguese - Brazil)
Română (Romanian)
Русский (Russian)
Suomi (Finnish)
Svenska (Swedish)
Türkçe (Turkish)
Tiếng Việt (Vietnamese)
Українська (Ukrainian)
Report a translation problem
Thanks for your feedback regarding the remaster.
I'll forward it on to the Assassin's Creed team for investigation.
- Ubisoft Support
Could the PC remaster receive an option to have the maximum draw-distance increased? Today's PCs should have no issue with having it much further than it was in the original release. So, having it be shorter than the original release isn't necessary.
https://youtu.be/YfKwS9ebHxA
And it makes even less sense that the remaster has an even shorter draw-distance than the original that released 7 years earlier.
Have u played unity? THAT game has really bad LOD, draw distance and teleporting npcs ^^
Yes, I've played it. Unity still has much better graphics than the remaster of AC3 and has far more, higher-poly NPCs on the screen, even if they don't have as far a draw-distance. I think that the teleporting NPCs might have been fixed in a patch. Unity's line-of-sight is also a lot shorter than AC3's, because Unity's environment is filled with buildings.