Original vs Remaster comparison :: Assassin's Creed III Remastered 综合讨论

Assassin's Creed III Remastered

Assassin's Creed III Remastered > 综合讨论 > 主题详情

LordBritish284 2019 年 4 月 1 日下午 1:53

Original vs Remaster comparison

Have a look at this comparison:
https://youtu.be/rStuw_U38G8

As you can see, there are advantages and disadvantages, but I don't understand why the developers didn't test the interplay of lighting, shading and texturing much more. The same model in the remaster looks like it has no depth and consists of plastic.

And why has the original game been removed from the store? Because the advantages of the remaster are not pronounced enough so it is worth 40 dollars?

What do you guys think?

< >

正在显示第 1 - 9 条，共 9 条留言

Crush

2019 年 4 月 1 日下午 2:15

A remastering with bader graphics? Now i feel 2 times scammed.

Konran

2019 年 4 月 1 日下午 2:21

引用自 Crush：
A remastering with bader graphics? Now i feel 2 times scammed.

lol "bader"

Grubbs008

2019 年 4 月 1 日下午 2:27

It was a selling point, It's the same game with increased graphics, loads of bugs two if which are Lighting and Skin textures. UBISOFT had no intention of spending loads of money, and time on this game as it was suppose to give people more incentive to buy ACO's Season Pass. The fact that it is $50 standalone is absurd, and just proves the point of how much greed and laziness developers can become when money is involved.

Crush

2019 年 4 月 1 日下午 3:12

I guess, i give it a shot :). My "missed" original has shown up at Uplay to. Only .5 times scammed now ;P. Need to check out if it is supporting Ansel etc.(Nvidia reshaders)
/edit: nope but nicer skin textures and a bit to much light at some scenes.

最后由 Crush 编辑于; 2019 年 4 月 1 日下午 6:38

Legion 2019 年 4 月 1 日下午 9:42

I mean...the original had a MP that was actually fun and not a bugging fecal volcano like Uplay's "CoOp". This one doesn't and that would've been the only reason I would've gotten it.