Install Steam
login
|
language
简体中文 (Simplified Chinese)
繁體中文 (Traditional Chinese)
日本語 (Japanese)
한국어 (Korean)
ไทย (Thai)
Български (Bulgarian)
Čeština (Czech)
Dansk (Danish)
Deutsch (German)
Español - España (Spanish - Spain)
Español - Latinoamérica (Spanish - Latin America)
Ελληνικά (Greek)
Français (French)
Italiano (Italian)
Bahasa Indonesia (Indonesian)
Magyar (Hungarian)
Nederlands (Dutch)
Norsk (Norwegian)
Polski (Polish)
Português (Portuguese - Portugal)
Português - Brasil (Portuguese - Brazil)
Română (Romanian)
Русский (Russian)
Suomi (Finnish)
Svenska (Swedish)
Türkçe (Turkish)
Tiếng Việt (Vietnamese)
Українська (Ukrainian)
Report a translation problem
So, yeah, if a civ asks you to go to war and you say yes, just keep in mind some of the requesters may actually like you less later on.
Then again, then I would wonder why you would ever say yes... Unless the requester is a honourable civ like the Danish, Hunnic, Aztecs or Mongols a request is just an excuse for you to start a war and piss of almost everybody including the requester...
Oh come on you can't be serious!
Well ye can disregard my post for the most part, OP. My results were just a case of utterly bizarre game design and stupid AI.
From my experience what you stated is correct. I have never gotten warmonger status from the co-conspirator. But I avoid killing civs off completely.
It's rare for me to accept those requests. Sometimes the timing is just right and it gives "fought against a common foe' bonus. It's rarely worth it though since I find the AI takes the first peace deal and leaves you hanging most of the time. Which might be where the war monger status with the requester is coming from for some people.
I don't think so. Except for the obvious responses to theft and city state bullying. The "vermin breeding" remarks are for color as far as I can tell. I typically get them when I befriend someone the insulter considers a foe. It's unlikely they will ever like you after that.
Nah this must be true because it would completely explain Indonesia's backstabbing after I took down an enemy of theirs by conquering his only city, and also why Pacal hated me more then the guy who broke a Declaration of Friendship, backstabbed him and started a war against him. 'cuz taking cities and killing civs is the true evil.
If the requester is very far away from the civ they want to fight they'll pretty much never send units. If they're close by you'll occaisionally see some of their units tapdancing on the borders until they take enough damage and retreat, which, if you remember the times you got attacked by AI, is pretty much their entire war strategy.
Now sometimes they are actually not even gonna try to help you, but most of the time it's just their dumb AI.
Sometimes they don't. If you ask them to wait ten turns they may or may not declare when the time comes. If you accept, you both declare immediately, but that doesn't mean they will actually do anything.
It makes me feel like they played me for a sucker so they could extort the victim with a peace deal. Just don't accept unless you planned on it anyway. Just know that they may extort all the good stuff and leave nothing for your peace deal.
But I do the same to them. So I guess it's fair play.
On the other hand I liberated a befriended civ to only discover they called me a warmonger as a reward.
Where it comes to an invitation for war I usually do not conquer cities. I pick off units and pillage the place. After about 10 turns a nice peace deal will come up, usually with a heap of luxuries and sometimes there's a city in it too.