Zainstaluj Steam
zaloguj się
|
język
简体中文 (chiński uproszczony)
繁體中文 (chiński tradycyjny)
日本語 (japoński)
한국어 (koreański)
ไทย (tajski)
български (bułgarski)
Čeština (czeski)
Dansk (duński)
Deutsch (niemiecki)
English (angielski)
Español – España (hiszpański)
Español – Latinoamérica (hiszpański latynoamerykański)
Ελληνικά (grecki)
Français (francuski)
Italiano (włoski)
Bahasa Indonesia (indonezyjski)
Magyar (węgierski)
Nederlands (niderlandzki)
Norsk (norweski)
Português (portugalski – Portugalia)
Português – Brasil (portugalski brazylijski)
Română (rumuński)
Русский (rosyjski)
Suomi (fiński)
Svenska (szwedzki)
Türkçe (turecki)
Tiếng Việt (wietnamski)
Українська (ukraiński)
Zgłoś problem z tłumaczeniem
Civ V is finished anyways. There will be no more new features for it.
http://www.mobygames.com/game/dos/sid-meiers-civilization/screenshots/gameShotId,134366/
why should it be '90s it was what made games GREAT, and could be again.
it should return!
Besides the '90s were the golden age of gaming, the best games ever were made than, after than it only went downhill, so some "gaming renesaince" can't hurt in that respect either.
I totally agree!
Joking right?:P The trone room from civ II or the palace from III were nice though.
have any video how this civ 1 palace improves over time?
READ MORE: http://www.civilization6.net/civilization-6-release-date/
:D
I came to the same calculation, on my own.
there was originally 6 years between every game of civ, that lately seems to be speeded up to 5, placing indeed civ VI at the end of 2015. howver since thats still almost 2 years away, they will be still milking out the civ V concept, would not count it behind them to try to sell us 1 more expantion set between now and than, and requisting a dlc like this would not be above their abilty to grab sime extra bucks either.
I never said games in the 90's were bad. I said live acting (with green screens) was. It may have been good back then but doing that in games now would be a step backwards.
than we differ of opinion in that regard, I LOVED it, I did also LOVE it in other games (like red alert, and such) and miss it greatly.. and wish it to return.
It may have to do that I like to both watch and play classic theather plays (invide me to a shakespeare performance anyday, and I loved playing brutus myself;)
(and this, the bloody deed we did, 't was pity!")
still I must not be the only person that absoluted loves those little ingame "plays"
Yes I am aware of this site. and the very first sentence
Here’s the quick answer to the question you’ve been meaning to ask:
The Civilization 6 Release Date has not yet been announced and its development has not yet been announced either
I asked how you KNOW this. Speculation is all you got.
Here is my Speculation
1991 - Civ 1 released
1996 - Civ 2 released( expansions 1997 and 1999)
2001 - Civ 3 released( expansions 2002 and 2003)
2005 - Civ 4 Relased( expansions 2006 and 2007)
2008 - Civ Conolization(technically civ 4 expansion) and Civ Revolution (console game)
2010 - Civ 5 relased( expansions 2012 and 2013)
2011 - Civ world( facebook)
So looking at the time line it seems to be
each game gets released 2 expansions each taking 1 year for each release.
2 years development for each full civ game.
1 year for each spin-off.
So IF they decide to work on civ 6 then yes you are correct. But with the New console's out I beleve they will be working on Civlization Revolution 2 for 2015 and Civlization 6 will come out in 2016.
if nothing else they might re-include them in civ 6, that would be result too, though having them in both civ 5 and 6 would be even better.