Install Steam
login
|
language
简体中文 (Simplified Chinese)
繁體中文 (Traditional Chinese)
日本語 (Japanese)
한국어 (Korean)
ไทย (Thai)
Български (Bulgarian)
Čeština (Czech)
Dansk (Danish)
Deutsch (German)
Español - España (Spanish - Spain)
Español - Latinoamérica (Spanish - Latin America)
Ελληνικά (Greek)
Français (French)
Italiano (Italian)
Bahasa Indonesia (Indonesian)
Magyar (Hungarian)
Nederlands (Dutch)
Norsk (Norwegian)
Polski (Polish)
Português (Portuguese - Portugal)
Português - Brasil (Portuguese - Brazil)
Română (Romanian)
Русский (Russian)
Suomi (Finnish)
Svenska (Swedish)
Türkçe (Turkish)
Tiếng Việt (Vietnamese)
Українська (Ukrainian)
Report a translation problem
Or all coastal cities, but all with harbors.
One bonus fact. Srategic resources are located near city states quite often, in their 3-5 rings. So, city at middle of the island would be able to grab those from city states.
You would not be able make a city connection (without another city on coast), it's a small handicap. Coastal city should have half of it's tiles in useless water tiles and won't have a mountain for observatory, so I would go to inland science city. You could get food cargo ships if the city is coastal, but that city location is full of food, so it won't be needed and will be better used elsewhere. I don't see real benefits for a coastal city, because city location has enough food and lacks gold tiles.
Second your "main" cities should have been settled millenia ago, e.g should have been growing/getting science buildings the whole game up till now with great population. Cities this late into a game are not for science but if you need somewhere to attack from with planes or to get resources like oil aluminium or coal if you really need it. Not to settle a useless wonder.
Lastly get the better wonders pack it makes wonders like old faithful much better (2 happiness, 8 science, 4 gold)
Im fairly new to playing civ, have watched a few games on youtube over the years, bought it last year and won a science victory while also eliminating my neighbouring civs on settler difficulty. After a long break, Ive come back to It with all the DLC and really enjoying it. Have yet to have a victory that wasnt a score victory since coming back though, so I hope to actually get a proper victory this time. Maybe it was the difficulty skip to cheiftain? I dunno.
Another thought I had was, what if I created the inland city and also made a size 1 city on the coast and select avoid growth just to get the coastal connection? Any consequences in doing that?
But tbh.. im not sure i would settle at all
It's 1610. That city will never be any good. If you settle next to mountain for Observatory, the game will be over before that city is any worth - even if you send two food, and 2 production trade routes. if You settle next to mountain, it will never grow to Silk, so permanently cost you 4 happiness.
Settle on Silk, you get the Lux instantly, and the gold in your city without having to work it.
It's possible the Natural Wonder counts as a mountain, I'm not sure. Most of the science is over come 1610, you're probably near Research Labs.
I'd scrap the idea, it won't help you. That's my opinion anyway.
:)
buy 2 tiles and youre golden
edit ; but yea. i wouldnt settle there in the first place. i would build an army and crush em all