Install Steam
login
|
language
简体中文 (Simplified Chinese)
繁體中文 (Traditional Chinese)
日本語 (Japanese)
한국어 (Korean)
ไทย (Thai)
Български (Bulgarian)
Čeština (Czech)
Dansk (Danish)
Deutsch (German)
Español - España (Spanish - Spain)
Español - Latinoamérica (Spanish - Latin America)
Ελληνικά (Greek)
Français (French)
Italiano (Italian)
Bahasa Indonesia (Indonesian)
Magyar (Hungarian)
Nederlands (Dutch)
Norsk (Norwegian)
Polski (Polish)
Português (Portuguese - Portugal)
Português - Brasil (Portuguese - Brazil)
Română (Romanian)
Русский (Russian)
Suomi (Finnish)
Svenska (Swedish)
Türkçe (Turkish)
Tiếng Việt (Vietnamese)
Українська (Ukrainian)
Report a translation problem
There are 2 main disadvantages though. The first one is... that it's actually a giant fresh-water lake so no whales, reefs or natural wonders. It's just a huge empty body of water. The second one is that is that due to huge water mass civs and city-states have quite a bit less actual land to settle so if you spawn on the edge and don't forward-settle there is a fair chance that by the time your expansion 'naturally' expands to water body on your 4th-5th city there will be no good spots left. Same goes to when you spawn near water.
All in all, it's a VERY fun map to play on
In general i don't like settling coastally in your capital you for the most part care about production although growth is a major concern you want tonnes of hills for great people and you want a production value that's quite high. Settling coastally drastically reduces your available tiles and is much riskier with barbarians on.