Install Steam
login
|
language
简体中文 (Simplified Chinese)
繁體中文 (Traditional Chinese)
日本語 (Japanese)
한국어 (Korean)
ไทย (Thai)
Български (Bulgarian)
Čeština (Czech)
Dansk (Danish)
Deutsch (German)
Español - España (Spanish - Spain)
Español - Latinoamérica (Spanish - Latin America)
Ελληνικά (Greek)
Français (French)
Italiano (Italian)
Bahasa Indonesia (Indonesian)
Magyar (Hungarian)
Nederlands (Dutch)
Norsk (Norwegian)
Polski (Polish)
Português (Portuguese - Portugal)
Português - Brasil (Portuguese - Brazil)
Română (Romanian)
Русский (Russian)
Suomi (Finnish)
Svenska (Swedish)
Türkçe (Turkish)
Tiếng Việt (Vietnamese)
Українська (Ukrainian)
Report a translation problem
This is pretty much everything you could ask for from a good remaster.
1. Excellent mod support
2. Visual updates
3. Optional improvements that can each be toggled on and off.
There seems to be many different things that players value about Total War games, I've got many hours in most of the main titles, just not Warhammer, and what I grow to love about one game can be the main reason the next player hates that title. It's really interesting how different we all are but still play the same or similar game.
I couldn't get into Rome Remastered, but it's not because I think it's a bad game. It's just that the things that it does well, I don't value that highly, where as the things that say Attila or Three Kingdoms does well, the next player doesn't seem to care about.
It's best that you watch some let's play videos on Youtube to see how the game plays before buying it.
What I rate as a 9/10 game, the next player thinks is the worst title in the series.
Each to their own.
Now and again I check a website called ‘Steam Charts’.
If you type ‘Total War’ into the search it will tell you which games are being played the most. I use the ‘30 day average’ metric. The amount of people playing Warhammer makes me want to throw up. But anyway I guess we are in a minority now that like the more grounded Total War experience.