Rome Remastered vs Rome 2 ?

[Mathusalem]

Hello !
Which one has more contents ?
Thanks !

[Zenon]

Rome 2 has by far more content but in everything else, Rome Remastered is better. It is a better game.

[Legoras]

Content - Rome 2
Gameplay, realistic, balance, fun fron game, AI, Rome 1/ hopefuly also Remastered

[Mesut2807]

At least no other historical Total War game has as much content as Rome 2. Multiple campaigns, dozens of playable factions. Hundreds of units and you can get the base game plus dlc in sales for ca. 20-30€. Rome 1 is just a classic. Hard to compare the two games. They are so different.

[Mesut2807]

Originally posted by Legoras:

Content - Rome 2
Gameplay, realistic, balance, fun fron game, AI, Rome 1/ hopefuly also Remastered

realistic? What about Rome 1 is realistic

[GreyWolf]

Originally posted by Mesut2807:

Originally posted by Legoras:

Content - Rome 2
Gameplay, realistic, balance, fun fron game, AI, Rome 1/ hopefuly also Remastered

realistic? What about Rome 1 is realistic

Population.
Ability to divide your army.
Need of siege weapons instead of solders hacking gates with their swords lol.
Diplomats & merchants
Watchtowers
Forts
and more

Rome 2 is a more mainstream version of a Rome

[GreyWolf]

Pretty much everything summed up in this post:
http://www.twcenter.net/forums/showthread.php?628677-Everything-Rome-1-had-that-Rome-2-doesn-t

[DeLastOne]

Originally posted by Kamakaziwarlord:

Pretty much everything summed up in this post:
http://www.twcenter.net/forums/showthread.php?628677-Everything-Rome-1-had-that-Rome-2-doesn-t

Bit old post :) lots changed since 2013 - 2014

[fox]

Originally posted by Acroneos:

Rome 2 has by far more content but in everything else, Rome Remastered is better. It is a better game.

What are you talking about? It's not even out yet

[Emperor]

Originally posted by Mathusalem:

Hello !
Which one has more contents ?
Thanks !

Both have a fair amount of content in their own right. Rome Remastered will contain the base-game campaign, the Barbarian Invasion DLC campaign, and the Alexandar DLC campaign.

Rome II contains the base-game campaign and the Imperator Augustus DLC campaign. Rome II also includes additional campaigns and content if you are willing to spend extra money.

Rome and Rome II are fairly different games mechanically. Rome does some things better than Rome II, and Rome II does some things better than Rome. Which you will prefer comes down to a matter of taste, and you might like both, as I do. With mods, the lifespan of both games increases considerably.

[Archize Ragni]

I would not say Rome 1 was more historically accurate..at all.

[No Longer A Demon Door]

Rome 2 obviously has more content, but it all went downhill with gamebreaking 'fixes' from early 2018 onwards.

[Andy]

Rome 1 deals with collision much better. And, rather than the rome 2 battles of static lines with individuals smearing into each others lines. In Rome one the formation would try and stay together while the weaker units get pushed backwards.
That means, if nothing else. Battles appear far better.

[GreyWolf]

Strategy and campaign = Rome, awesome battles and units = Rome 2

[Rhalius]

In rome 2, all units look the same and in Rome 1 you can easily tell them apart.

[Get Donked On]

rome 2 has a more historical campaign but the feel of the battles is just horrible unit collision is a joke and ranged combat is somehow worse than games that are decades older. rome 1 biggest flaw is that some factions are pretty historically inaccurate like egypt but compared to rome 2s problems those are a lot easier to fix with mods.