Install Steam
login
|
language
简体中文 (Simplified Chinese)
繁體中文 (Traditional Chinese)
日本語 (Japanese)
한국어 (Korean)
ไทย (Thai)
Български (Bulgarian)
Čeština (Czech)
Dansk (Danish)
Deutsch (German)
Español - España (Spanish - Spain)
Español - Latinoamérica (Spanish - Latin America)
Ελληνικά (Greek)
Français (French)
Italiano (Italian)
Bahasa Indonesia (Indonesian)
Magyar (Hungarian)
Nederlands (Dutch)
Norsk (Norwegian)
Polski (Polish)
Português (Portuguese - Portugal)
Português - Brasil (Portuguese - Brazil)
Română (Romanian)
Русский (Russian)
Suomi (Finnish)
Svenska (Swedish)
Türkçe (Turkish)
Tiếng Việt (Vietnamese)
Українська (Ukrainian)
Report a translation problem
It's fine if you like Resident Evil to be slow and boring, but don't get mad at the poor guy just for pointing out the obvious.
I played RE 6 first then i start rolling back on the old ones ( 1 , original 2 and also 0 )
From what im reading on the above , you are just here to get people sh*t on you
Have fun about having the " maso" perk" , enjoy it
Well, boredom is a subjective emotional state, so splitting hairs about that is pointless. Your mileage may vary.
We can say that, in general, the majority of people find fast-paced things to be exciting, and slow-placed things to be boring. Certainly, excitement and boredom correlate strongly with the pace of a given activity; faster-paced activities produce more adrenaline and have a higher capacity to generate exicement, but each individual has his or her own tolerance threshold for just how much excitement he can take. A young man with high testosterone, for example, may find wing suiting to be an exciting and pleasurable activity; for an old lady, however, wing suiting might provide far more stimulation than her elderly body can handle, possibly leading to heart attacks or strokes. The young man and the old lady's tolerance for excitement, and thus their perception of what constitutes a suitably exciting or boring activity, depends upon their own subjective judgement. But at the same time, each person's subjective judgment is informed by the objective properties of incoming stimuli. So, while the individual must ultimately judge for himself, we can certainly make informed predictions about which way this judgement is likely to go.
RE 2 is objectively slow, being far slower and having far less action than its recent predecesors. That is a fact and no one disputes it. So, I guess a more fair and accurate way to word this would be:
The game is slow, and you might find it boring, unless you're an old lady.
gj
Newer gen gamers like this make me feel that abortion would have been better in this case.
If the horror atmosphere doesn't work for you, you probably will not enjoy this game much. The gameplay isn't that great to be honest. I'd recommend RE4 anyday to anyone though, it's a great game, if you want to play a resident evil game, go for RE4.
"5 and 6 ARE brainless and action-heavy games.
It's fine if you like Resident Evil to be brainless and action-heavy, but don't get mad at the poor guy just for pointing out the obvious."
On a serious note, there's no "pointing out the obvious". Comparing old-style survival horror with co-op shooter is just plain stupid. These games are NOT comparable.
As much as I hate RE6, I don't mind people who like it. It is completely your choice and there's nothing wrong with it. But if you gonna come here and scream "WTF this game is slow and boring RE6 is much better" without anything constructive - well, something is wrong with you then.