Silence of the Siren.

[ttodorov]

Developers go and see how it have to be done "spiritual" successor.

[Imry von Larisch]

Originally posted by ttodorov:

Boohoo I have to make build choices because I can't put all my units on one hero and pixels ugly, I prefer flash games graphics. I want to play Heroes 3 clone and nothing even slightly different.

Lol

[ttodorov]

That does not change the fact that Silence of the Siren is better game that Songs of Conquest.

[Imry von Larisch]

Can't say, didn't play it yet (people can play and prefer different game, shocking if you played only heroes 3 for last 25 years, I know)

Numbers speak otherwise tho, SoC is played by about 600 players rn after 2,5 years, SotS is peaked on 200 two days ago and I seen feedbackgaming making video on it already.

People have spoken and they said your opinion is simply wrong.

[ttodorov]

Can you remind me where did you get the Quote you post from me, because i
cant find it?And my profile is open so everybody can see what i am playing and i have played.

[Bumc]

Originally posted by ttodorov:

Things

You can edit someone else's message on steam freely while quoting without having to reference any actual post.

[G3N0]

Originally posted by Ser Imry Florent:

Can't say, didn't play it yet (people can play and prefer different game, shocking if you played only heroes 3 for last 25 years, I know)

Numbers speak otherwise tho, SoC is played by about 600 players rn after 2,5 years, SotS is peaked on 200 two days ago and I seen feedbackgaming making video on it already.

People have spoken and they said your opinion is simply wrong.

SoC 1.0 release was in May like 5 months ago not 2.5 years ago. They also just had a update like 3 days ago allowing you to mix factions so thats inflating numbers. Before that it has been around 300-400 people a day which is fine nothing wrong with that but the averages right now arent the norm.

Either way these are single player games for most people and not live service multiplayer games to be played for 30 years straight so theres nothing wrong with finishing and moving on.

My biggest concern about the new HOMM game is the seemingly huge focus on streamers and multiplayer. Thats not why 99% of people play strategy games.

[Imry von Larisch]

Originally posted by ttodorov:

Can you remind me where did you get the Quote you post from me, because i
cant find it?And my profile is open so everybody can see what i am playing and i have played.

Paraphrasing because that's general attitude of individuals who have some incredible hate-boner for this game and keep coming to the forums of the game they don't like and don't want to play for some reasons (not even for political reasons). Like don't you have anything else to do in life? More games of this genre with bigger variety and options means bigger exposure to bigger audience which means generally more content for us all in the future. But instead people keep coming and two biggest complains i keep hearing? 1) this isn't heroes 3 I want heroes 3. okay, go play heroes 3
2) ew pixels.

Also lol, you don't show games you play.

Originally posted by G3N0:

SoC 1.0 release was in May like 5 months ago not 2.5 years ago. They also just had a update like 3 days ago allowing you to mix factions so thats inflating numbers. Before that it has been around 300-400 people a day which is fine nothing wrong with that but the averages right now arent the norm.

Also no, there are steam charts, game is playable and tracked for 2,5 years, with over 4k players peak in EA, and almost 1200 players about two hours ago if you want to know. Even if you count only 1.0 in May it still had about 750 players on average with peak over 3k. Even if you count september, that was one of the lowest in games life, it still had about 280 players on average and 660 on peak.

Silence of the Siren has peak 207. That's it. Could go up in future, we see on the weekend, or perhaps their target audience is for mobile gaming, but looking at the steam statistic right now, don't you think is little pretentious to come here and told developers: look, those guys do it better? Numbers speaks for themselves.

[G3N0]

What do you mean no rofl? You admit yourself the game was around 300 in September before the update. I said like 300-400. And yes about 1200 an hour ago because the update just came out like I said. This happens to literally every game out there.

Saying the peak from EA has nothing to do with how many are playing now. Im not attacking the game its ok you dont have to convince me. Youre telling me Im wrong while literally saying it averaged 280 and peaked at 660 last month rofl.

None of this matters this isnt an online live service game. People will come and go at their leisure. People who are looking strictly for pvp games might struggle after the bump goes back down thats about it.

No comment on Silence of Siren. Im not pushing that game so theres no need to tell me how much worse its doing Im not even interested in it. I was just saying there is currently a bump in player activity because of an update which is 100% normal but its not the usual player numbers.

[Imry von Larisch]

What are you on about? Alright I will explain it to you one more time. My point is that one game on it's lowest has still bigger player count that other game on it's highest. And the guy comes and says: "look, this game that's doing nowhere as good as yours is doing it better."

[G3N0]

Thats great none of that has anything to do with what I said. I said this game has been averaging around 300-400 players and currently is higher because of an update. The numbers from the update though arent the normal. I also said the game came out in may and not 2.5 years ago. I was just stating facts for others.

Your whole other thing with him has nothing to do with what I said lol.

Have a good one its not that deep friend.

[Imry von Larisch]

And I was correcting your wrong facts.

[MeGa]

The graphics are so, so, so much better than this blurry mess of pixel (f)art.

Here we dont even have decent unit cards, with some art or 3d model of the unit, and a lore description.

While SoC has some great gameplay elements, its worse in many other aspects than Silence of the Siren.

[ttodorov]

Originally posted by Bumc:

Originally posted by ttodorov:

Things

You can edit someone else's message on steam freely while quoting without having to reference any actual post.

Thank you, i was thinking it may be that way.So Ser Imry Florent was lying, how can be dialog without true.

[Lakota]

Originally posted by Ser Imry Florent:

Can't say, didn't play it yet (people can play and prefer different game, shocking if you played only heroes 3 for last 25 years, I know)

Numbers speak otherwise tho, SoC is played by about 600 players rn after 2,5 years, SotS is peaked on 200 two days ago and I seen feedbackgaming making video on it already.

People have spoken and they said your opinion is simply wrong.

Right now there are 2157 playing HoMM3 HD Edition.

[Imry von Larisch]

Originally posted by Nate and Lakota:

Originally posted by Ser Imry Florent:

Can't say, didn't play it yet (people can play and prefer different game, shocking if you played only heroes 3 for last 25 years, I know)

Numbers speak otherwise tho, SoC is played by about 600 players rn after 2,5 years, SotS is peaked on 200 two days ago and I seen feedbackgaming making video on it already.

People have spoken and they said your opinion is simply wrong.

Right now there are 2157 playing HoMM3 HD Edition.

Looks like they don't agree with Silence of the Siren being worthy their time as well.

Thank you for proving my point.