Install Steam
login
|
language
简体中文 (Simplified Chinese)
繁體中文 (Traditional Chinese)
日本語 (Japanese)
한국어 (Korean)
ไทย (Thai)
Български (Bulgarian)
Čeština (Czech)
Dansk (Danish)
Deutsch (German)
Español - España (Spanish - Spain)
Español - Latinoamérica (Spanish - Latin America)
Ελληνικά (Greek)
Français (French)
Italiano (Italian)
Bahasa Indonesia (Indonesian)
Magyar (Hungarian)
Nederlands (Dutch)
Norsk (Norwegian)
Polski (Polish)
Português (Portuguese - Portugal)
Português - Brasil (Portuguese - Brazil)
Română (Romanian)
Русский (Russian)
Suomi (Finnish)
Svenska (Swedish)
Türkçe (Turkish)
Tiếng Việt (Vietnamese)
Українська (Ukrainian)
Report a translation problem
Yeah, IOI claims the deal with Epic Games lets them "have more independence" but based of the deals with Sony and Tencent, this is obviously not the case. They care about their bottom line and revenue.
Not the people who have every other hitman title on steam, or have supported them since 2004. IOI left all the real fans behind, in favor of the children who clamor for Tencent's blood money.
Seriously, it's not right of China for what they're trying to do to Hong Kong. I say the CCP is more of a threat than the American government but we're getting off-topic here.
doing business with china isn't the same as being owned by it.
the reality is epic is owned by china, while valve is owned by valve.
But I must acknowledge that I was wrong about KH3 not being available in China, the game was censored instead of being banned like I thought. So I guess there's a chance for it to appear on Chinese Steam if it's not permanently exclusive to EGS.
There's almost no difference in how they both operate, see what I wrote above about the censorship.
Epic isn't being randomly taken over through public trading, it's only giving shares to partners they want in private investment deals.
What's funny though is everyone still harping on tencent giving epic half a billion dollars over half a decade ago, but no one talking about the multiple billions of dollars from even more recent investor partnerships.
The danger of egs behavior isn't the tencent deal, it's the monopoly they want to control the market and their willingness to do it with anti consumer tactics.
Steam isn't a monopoly, there's been healthy competition and if steam remained at the top it's been from providing players what they want and the others compete by offering niche services and alternate curating packages.
What is egs doing to compete? Paying developers to not be on steam? Breaking up franchise collections for people who want sets in one place? Not offering services that people want?
It's an inferior service competing purely with bully tactics instead of quality. I don't have to look beyond their crap behavior as a company to not be interested in buying from them.
Who they partner with beyond that is just typical sociopathic business decision-making.