Інсталювати Steam
увійти
|
мова
简体中文 (спрощена китайська)
繁體中文 (традиційна китайська)
日本語 (японська)
한국어 (корейська)
ไทย (тайська)
Български (болгарська)
Čeština (чеська)
Dansk (данська)
Deutsch (німецька)
English (англійська)
Español - España (іспанська — Іспанія)
Español - Latinoamérica (іспанська — Латинська Америка)
Ελληνικά (грецька)
Français (французька)
Italiano (італійська)
Bahasa Indonesia (індонезійська)
Magyar (угорська)
Nederlands (нідерландська)
Norsk (норвезька)
Polski (польська)
Português (португальська — Португалія)
Português - Brasil (португальська — Бразилія)
Română (румунська)
Русский (російська)
Suomi (фінська)
Svenska (шведська)
Türkçe (турецька)
Tiếng Việt (в’єтнамська)
Повідомити про проблему з перекладом
If you don't want to be part of a community effort to persuade the dev team that their choice could be improved, don't. Not everybody has to help wikipedia improve either, but we all reap the benefits.
I would not like to put a figure on how many months of dedicated scholarship it would take to produce a moderately correct list of place names and leader names for each region, but they've done it. You now want them to compare alternatives from different sources and know which is more likely to be correct? Even dedicated historians argue and debate over these things their entire careers. I'm glad they shipped with a working list and are open to improving it over time.
I'm assuming things like this will be given attention eventually as they patch the game. Just as they fixed those in CK2.
@RJM I would not mind doing so if it would truly help. Is there some sort of submission form or you meant just on the forums?
@LateGameWonder Neither Iberia nor Colchis ever had Iranic identity. Kartvelian tribes living there as well as the kingdoms that arose in their place later on were conquered over the history many times but they never got assimilated or adopted culture of their conquerors. They certainly haven't changed skin color and made plastic surgery to look like their conquerors either. Persians just demanded their tithe to be paid on time, but left the governance to the local ruler that was considered their vassal. There are local names for all the government positions, but I am not even asking to add them. Simple "general', "diplomat", etc would do as long as its not unpronounceable names that are completely out of place. They were not Zoroastrian either, they had their own pantheon headed by god Armaz(the only thing this game got right btw), which was replaced by Christianity in 320 AD not 500.
@Captainradish I agree and understand that. There must be even less records that are translated from Georgian to English, but its not excuse just to slap a different country's model on others and call it done. That's just lazy.
@Ratogodoy Maybe some Caucasian people are, there are lot of them, but Kartvelian tribes have nothing to do with Iranian or Indian people.
@CurtadamsCA Finally someone that understands! I am surprised to find someone knowing that much about Kartvelian tribes and language outside of Georgia. Thank you for your input.
@Mocha Hopefully, don't know what happened in CK2 but if they fixed it there its a good sign.
@Yhyzys That is unfortunate. There are hundreds of factions but it seems to me its not that much work to get proper namelists and adjust drawings here and there if you had a few years to make the game. Guess they just figured that majority of players would not notice so they just took the easy route.
Okay, I've learned something here. :) All this time I thought modern Spain/Portugal was the only Iberia.
even the name of the supposed founder of the Iberian kingdom is Persian (Pharnavaz) and his mother in the "history" is cited to supposedly be daughter of Darius II.
Also there are ample amount of archaeological evidence that point at Scythians settling in Caucuses during the bronze age which the people of Ossetia are a direct proof of too.