Install Steam
login
|
language
简体中文 (Simplified Chinese)
繁體中文 (Traditional Chinese)
日本語 (Japanese)
한국어 (Korean)
ไทย (Thai)
Български (Bulgarian)
Čeština (Czech)
Dansk (Danish)
Deutsch (German)
Español - España (Spanish - Spain)
Español - Latinoamérica (Spanish - Latin America)
Ελληνικά (Greek)
Français (French)
Italiano (Italian)
Bahasa Indonesia (Indonesian)
Magyar (Hungarian)
Nederlands (Dutch)
Norsk (Norwegian)
Polski (Polish)
Português (Portuguese - Portugal)
Português - Brasil (Portuguese - Brazil)
Română (Romanian)
Русский (Russian)
Suomi (Finnish)
Svenska (Swedish)
Türkçe (Turkish)
Tiếng Việt (Vietnamese)
Українська (Ukrainian)
Report a translation problem
There's actually a lot of differences.
- Game has primaries against other candidates
- Every candidate has historical surrogates
- There's newspaper with historical news from the election
- Governors, Senators, some Rep, and notables, ex-presidents, organizations, etc. can endorse and become surrogates.
- There are various kinds of ads that can be created to boost a candidacy or attack an opponent.
- Election results are generally realistic.
- Including well-made user-created scenarios, historical elections cover from 1788-2016. There's also a 2020 election that is out, but it hasn't been updated since Covid stopped traditional rallies and things.
The history + demographics of each state matter more - the Dems are never going to win Wyoming no matter what.
There's fog of war - you don't actually know who will win the close states until people vote on Election Day.
And you have to be much more careful with your finances; it's possible to bankrupt yourself with one expensive, failed ad campaign.
Having said that, 270 is more casual + therefore more fun sometimes. You need to commit a few hours to each game of Infinity.