Instale o Steam
iniciar sessão
|
idioma
简体中文 (Chinês simplificado)
繁體中文 (Chinês tradicional)
日本語 (Japonês)
한국어 (Coreano)
ไทย (Tailandês)
Български (Búlgaro)
Čeština (Tcheco)
Dansk (Dinamarquês)
Deutsch (Alemão)
English (Inglês)
Español-España (Espanhol — Espanha)
Español-Latinoamérica (Espanhol — América Latina)
Ελληνικά (Grego)
Français (Francês)
Italiano (Italiano)
Bahasa Indonesia (Indonésio)
Magyar (Húngaro)
Nederlands (Holandês)
Norsk (Norueguês)
Polski (Polonês)
Português (Portugal)
Română (Romeno)
Русский (Russo)
Suomi (Finlandês)
Svenska (Sueco)
Türkçe (Turco)
Tiếng Việt (Vietnamita)
Українська (Ucraniano)
Relatar um problema com a tradução
But like I said, having played almost every aspect of the game in almost every security level space, it is not a game for PvE players who don't just want to be victims.
My opinions are not locked in by FanBoi-ishness or only having played on one side... like say... a ganker who has never really PvE'd.
CCP can fix the game at any time. It's too bad they continually choose to cater to the "be the space pirate that you always wanted to be" crowd.
But then the game was founded on that so it's no suprise.
But, yeah, at this time, there are better options imo for PvE players than the gankfest that is EVE Online.
But as long as you're making it clear that what you're saying is an expression of your own opinion(s), then I have no problem with what you say. Only when you try (and have tried) to pass off your opinions as facts, is when I stepped in to correct you.
I love Brave Newbies and never rule anything out.
But I am currently a Provi man... you know what I mean? lol
Null Sec and High Sec PvP is decent in EVE Online... pretty much (I am not a fan of blobbing, personally).
But if you're a PvE player in EVE Online, you're going to lose more than you gain in the game. It's just the way the game is built right now. It's a PvP game and it favors destruction. Advantage: ganker, griefer, player "pirate," scammer and thief.
You know, I had a convo with Shotgun about upgrading PvE and making it more immersive and fun. People with a game perspective like you makes me almost change my mind... thinking that the MMO EVE is (can be) a pure PvE game without interaction with other PvP players. It's like the vision of real life where you can ban out all crime and wars just because you don't like it... get real dude.
Why ask a ganker about PvE, especially in EVE? That's like asking a sociopathic killer who is hunting you for sport where a safe place to walk alone at night is. lol Shotgun has already said that he is a ganker, you know that, right?
Shotgun even admitted (albeit very unwillingly) in another thread that you can even expect EVE gankers to lie about the game in forums like this in order to, as he said, make PvE players more "complacent" victims.
I should ask Shotgun if he thinks any of the gankers/griefers would stoop so low as to pose as "innocent EVE PvE players" in the forums to also encourage "complacent" PvE victims to play the game.... You think that they would do that?
Yeah wouldn't life be great if we could get rid of all the hyper aggressive predatory sociopaths in the world?
But that's not realistic for RL.
It's good to know that CCP does have the ability to balance out EVE Online and make it more enjoyable for PvE players, though. It is really too bad that they keep choosing to allow the PvE players to be perpetually victimized by the hyper agressive predatory PvP players in EVE (gankers, griefers, player "pirates" and thieves). :(
Fortunately, PvE players looking for a more even playing field, or looking for a PvE environment where they can choose to turn off PvP at any time if they want to (or turn it on), have better options than EVE Online like the upcoming Elite Dangerous and Star Citizen. In those games, all of the hyper aggressive griefers, gankers and the like are instantly blocked from interfering with your PvE game at the click of a button. Or, they come back when YOU choose to turn on PvP, on YOUR terms. That's very empowering to the PvE players who want to have a little more for their money than being victimized repeatedly in EVE Online.
Don't you agree?
"Fly safe" is a saying in eve for a reason..
This guy seems to have a pretty solid argument that totally proves you wrong. It basically shows one supreme example of what PvE players experience (of which there are many) which illustrates how EVE Online game mechanics are flawed and totally unbalanced, favoring griefers and gankers to the detriment of PvE play styles:
https://forums.eveonline.com/default.aspx?g=posts&t=314901
That's you, isn't it? I am pretty sure that's you now. I would have forgotten completely had you not brought it up again. You know, we have special tools to cross-reference characters in various ways, and even things like forum post syntax. And everything is a pretty solid match.
So, rex Chelien, Abdul 'aleem, and, who's your other guy? Is it Yverdracy?
You could at least not pretend to be someone else when referencing your EVE-O posts so much. At least get some respect for your integrity that way.
Not going to actually talk about game imbalances again, Shotgun? I don't blame you.
If PvE players knew the truth of what to expect in EVE Online BEFORE they bought it from you on your profile page (I know, i know, you're totally unbiased... lol) your personal profits may suffer not to mention you would have less people to actually victimize in game.
You're a ganker who sells EVE Online products in real life for profit (in before Shotgun howls about how one has to "prove" bias! lol)
Victimizing people in and out of game, huh? Get their money when you convince them to buy the game, then you (or your griefer/ganker buddies) get to gank them for sport in game as a bonus. lol
Edit: I like how you changed your profile page. After I posted. lol
Oh and you could post your kill board anytime, Shotgun, instead of cowering behind the anonimity of the Internet from all those "big bad PvE carebears" that you're afraid of.... maybe you will get some respect for your integrity that way.
He insists that others agree with him, but no one does.