Instalar Steam
iniciar sesión
|
idioma
简体中文 (Chino simplificado)
繁體中文 (Chino tradicional)
日本語 (Japonés)
한국어 (Coreano)
ไทย (Tailandés)
български (Búlgaro)
Čeština (Checo)
Dansk (Danés)
Deutsch (Alemán)
English (Inglés)
Español - España
Ελληνικά (Griego)
Français (Francés)
Italiano
Bahasa Indonesia (indonesio)
Magyar (Húngaro)
Nederlands (Holandés)
Norsk (Noruego)
Polski (Polaco)
Português (Portugués de Portugal)
Português - Brasil (Portugués - Brasil)
Română (Rumano)
Русский (Ruso)
Suomi (Finés)
Svenska (Sueco)
Türkçe (Turco)
Tiếng Việt (Vietnamita)
Українська (Ucraniano)
Informar de un error de traducción
Is BZ worth 30+? Gawd no. But it does allow for probing of the market on how many people aren't paying attention or are willing to shell out that amount on PC regardless, and pending on that success or lack there of they now have a buffer to offer it on sale (which quite a few threads have been posted about asking if a sale were to happen) and not lose any margin from the current price.
It's smart business imo, not greedy thus far, but my only head tilt is should BZ be the same price as SN? My feeling... heck no. Should be 5 bucks less at a min. This could pose a problem in that the the ends don't justify the means at all and could be risky, possibly.
One of the things I am curious about is what the ESRB is going to be for BZ. Now that they have obliterated the story and content and added all the current, 'stuff', that is now the game, I don't see how this could be rated the same as SN.
Almost as if the excuse "It's just a spin-off and not meant to be a full sequel" held about as much water as a sif and the developers have just become very, very lazy.
Then they had a wiff of success and what do they with the second game? They make it smaller, create a less coherent story, cram in some ham-fisted anti-coorperate messages (not saying the first game didn't have anti-coorperate overtones; it definitely had, but it didn't feel as forced there), and then they make the game more expensive. I would call that lazy.
But, like all successful companies, profit is king. Making a sequel to a massively successful game is a guaranteed way to make a lot of money. Just look at the "Lion King" remake. Everyone hated it. It was an inferior movie compared to the original. And yet it raked in $1.6 BILLION at the box office.
From the beginning, with this game, it was almost guaranteed that it would:
1. Not be as good as the original.
2. Be massively profitable.
As for the politics and anti-corporate B.S. ... When done right, that stuff sells. Rebelling against the "system" is part of the "system".
the only thing i wanted to see improving from the first game, was bigger maps to explore with our cyclops and seamoth, more open world with some sort of replayability and maybe even multiplayer, and NOT relly so much in the story, they did the opposite
first game $30 sure fair- this game? probably worth $10-15, this is a mini expansion DLC in terms of content and size
I was going to wait until the release of the new game to buy it, but a friend gifted me it. I would have gotten it regardless, but I wanted to wait since I very much dislike buying early access games these days.
Since I got the shaft more than once this year buying so called triple A games, which are going up in price, this minor increase is just that: minor. Besides, if your gaming dollar is limited, you can always wait for a sale.