Instale o Steam
iniciar sessão
|
idioma
简体中文 (Chinês simplificado)
繁體中文 (Chinês tradicional)
日本語 (Japonês)
한국어 (Coreano)
ไทย (Tailandês)
Български (Búlgaro)
Čeština (Tcheco)
Dansk (Dinamarquês)
Deutsch (Alemão)
English (Inglês)
Español-España (Espanhol — Espanha)
Español-Latinoamérica (Espanhol — América Latina)
Ελληνικά (Grego)
Français (Francês)
Italiano (Italiano)
Bahasa Indonesia (Indonésio)
Magyar (Húngaro)
Nederlands (Holandês)
Norsk (Norueguês)
Polski (Polonês)
Português (Portugal)
Română (Romeno)
Русский (Russo)
Suomi (Finlandês)
Svenska (Sueco)
Türkçe (Turco)
Tiếng Việt (Vietnamita)
Українська (Ucraniano)
Relatar um problema com a tradução
Este tópico foi trancado 
Regras e diretrizes para discussões
Denunciar esta mensagem
My argument is that them being cis white men has absolutely NOTHING to do with whether or not they are incompetent.
I'm sure there are some incompetent cis white men in corner offices.
I'm sure there are some incompetent cis white women in corner offices.
I'm sure there are some incompetent cis black men in corner offices.
I'm sure there are some incompetent cis black women in corner offices.
I'm sure there are some incompetent trans men in corner offices.
etc
etc
etc
etc
etc
Race, Gender, and Sexuality DO NOT MATTER whether or not someone is incompetent.
Like, how hard can that possibly be to understand?
You (and others like you) keep accusing cis white people of bigotry, but yet you have bigotry on full display here.
That's why the Right calls the Left Hypocrites on regular basis.
What you've been saying is hypocrisy and I'm sorry, but I have to call it what it is.
Ever heard of Correlation != Causation?
If someone is incompetent, that doesn't mean it's because of their race, or their gender, or their sexuality or any combination thereof.
You might say "the majority of incompetent people are...." but wait a minute, the majority of people are cis white people in the USA. Obviously, if you cherry pick a few on a certain criteria, say, incompetence, or those who own silver cars, you're going to end up with a number of white cis people outnumbering any other group.
Are you going to tell me that people who own silver cars, own silver cars because they are cis and white?
Whether there are or are not is separate from the need to specify that specific group. So go ahead, go on twitter and say the inverse, see what happens. "Well its true, there could be..."
That is profiling. Bringing attention and blame to a singular group or ethnicity. Avoiding the fact doesnt make it less relevant. "The stereotyping is okay because there are some that fall into that stereotype" is the argument being made. You are justifying an unjust action because part of the sample fits, but not calling out the problem itself.
As for race, call it what you will, but it exists.
Back to Nazi party, review history. They were democratically elected into power and garnered popular support. You can discuss hiding alterior motives, or conspiracy theories about funding. But reality is that they came to power by winning favour due to a party lead with a silver tongue.
Hindsight is glorious but all that which occured that made them a symbol of hate? It didnt exist in their inital rise. They curried favor with the populus all over the world on a platorm of economic and sociological equality.
Post before you talk about defending racism. That never occured. I am calling out condemnable behavior by another party. It doesnt matter their motives. Morally unjust actions is morally injust.
The difference between somebody with a sense of morality vs somebody with a sense of self superiority is somebody who is moral is able to call out their friends as well as their enemies. Moral accountability means holding people to their actions. Doing something wrong for the right reasons doesnt make it no longer the wrong thing to do. Using bigotry to fight bigotry only means that while you might be a better person, you arent by much and still a bad person to those who do not do such actions.
Except for the fact that for historical and institutional reasons Cis White Men are more likely to have opportunities regardless of personal competence.
But because of things like institutional prejudices, heredity, a history of disenfranchisement and what have you, Cis White Men are far more likely to have corner offices regardless of whether or not they're the most competent.
But race gender and sexuality affect the consequences, not just of competence but of many things. You did the 13/50 meme just a little while ago pal.
I was wondering when you were going to whip out the inherited victimhood card.
Bravo.
I knew you were going to play that sooner or later, and here we go.
Are you trying to tell me, that non-cis white people are the only people who come out of bad households, who have it rough?
I hope that's not what you're saying because anybody could pull up a list of people who, against all odds, came from poverty-stricken households and made a name for themselves, some of them white, some of them black, asian, what-have-you.
ANYBODY can do it, it takes a mixture of luck, perseverance, determination, and other things.
It doesn't matter what your ancestors went through, this is YOUR life. Sure, if you were born with a silver spoon, you have it easy. But some people who rose up from rags, were able to ascend to riches.
So can you, under the right situations.
There have also been children of rich people living on the streets homeless.
The important part is... stop being a victim and stop blaming everything else for your hardships. Stop sitting on the side of the street crying about "patriarchal society", "white supremacy", and "oppression", get off your butt, and MAKE SOMETHING of yourself.
Be a boon to society, not some internet keyboard warrior and maybe, just maybe, society will love you and you will succeed in life.
I didn't "do" anything, I only listed it as an example of things people say.
Badly written stories, in a game that tried to shift the focus towards having more story is a perfectly valid reason for being turned off on a game. Regardless of what exactly is IN the story, if a player does not like the story in a game that has made the story more of a focus of the game, then the player isn't going to like the game by extension. Or at least, they won't like it anywhere near as well as they should otherwise.
Similarly, a voiced PDA that gives you voiced hints, if it is difficult to understand, it can become a distraction during gameplay, and it can be annoying and irritating, especially when you hear it on a regular basis.
How is it forced in?
I could explain how there are systemic historic and institutional biases favoring the advancement of white men to positions of power, such as heredity being predominately biased in favor of male heirs, and such as the historic disenfranchisement of POC and the institutional disrespect towards and exclusion of females from positions of power. I could explain to you that even today there are companies that have a very misogynistic atmosphere, I could point out that Ubisoft for instance legally defended and actively rewarded a sexual predator for years while silencing his victims, but the sad truth is I doubt any of this would mean anything to you.
Race is a man made social construct, it's an arbitrary categorization that doesn't exist in nature. I dare you to try to prove otherwise if you're going to continue to sit there and continue to assert that it does.
Hitler and his wing of the party was never elected, Hitler was appointed to power and then appointed people loyal to him, and the socialists and social democrats who actually won the elections he used to get the appointment were killed once they were no longer needed.
Strasserites were massacred in the night of long knives and the remaining socialists with any influence were put to death as slaves on the autobahn writing confused letters to him about how evil men had seized control because they still thought he was one of them, and he never was he was using them from the start.
It's not a conspiracy theory, it's a historical fact that you can easily check.
They lied about who they were and what they represented, parasitized their ideological rivals, then murdered them.
About the only thing you got right is that they divided the German People against one another, made everyone live in fear of their neighbors, but what's your end goal with that?
Do you mean to imply that I, a bisexual, should align myself with white nationalists who want to lock me in an insane asylum and have me tortured with aversion therapy to try to condition the "gynephilia" out of me? Should I not be critical of people arguing that a homosexual character just existing is problematic because it's "too woke"? Dude I've seen games get huge backlashes just for having cis white women as protagonists and you know what's funny? The arguments haven't changed at all, the only thing that's changed is what they're complaining about being too woke.
Ah, dude's a nazi race realist, nvm
You don't care whether or not a statement is true you only care how you can use it to advance your anti-woke agenda.
No but I am telling you that cis white people males in particular are, due to a variety of factors, more likely to be advantaged in ways that have nothing to do with personal merit and tend to land them in positions of power.
I never once implied that all white males are equally advantaged only that being a white male confers advantages. This can't be a difficult concept for you to grasp. Though maybe it is since you threw a 13/50 meme at me.
The fact that the deck is stacked helps though.
Yes it does because what your ancestors went through influences the advantages you start with.
You talk as if there's a level playing field. Dude, it's still not level.
..
Lets just assume that everything said about Cis White Males and "western white misogynistic colonialism" is also true, and that everyone in the world who is non-white is constantly oppressed (either consciously or subconsciously).
..
Ok. So, I, as a 'cis white male', say.... "Yeah. Ok. Lucky me. Now what?"
..
????
..
Seriously. Now what? What would "you" (the SJW/Woke-Left side) suggest I do? What's the end game? What's the desired "goal" or, more importantly, just *HOW* would *YOU* suggest I, and every other cis white male in the world, act/do/behave?
..
I eagerly await your reply. :)
I mean the main thing would be not complaining and calling it woke and treating it like a problem every time people who aren't cis white males get any kind of representation.
Like that's the bare minimum right? Just tolerate people who aren't cis white males and treat them like you would anyone else, don't make a big deal about them. We can do that yah?
You probably can right? But some people seem to have a really hard time with it.
More representation, more options, greater equality and fairness generally.
To be able to exist in the world without our mere existence being treated like it's political and should be scrutinized. To be able to control our own bodies. For our rights as autonomous individuals not to be in jeopardy.
Woke has this curious ability to ruin the rest of the good work with the smaller detail