Install Steam
login
|
language
简体中文 (Simplified Chinese)
繁體中文 (Traditional Chinese)
日本語 (Japanese)
한국어 (Korean)
ไทย (Thai)
Български (Bulgarian)
Čeština (Czech)
Dansk (Danish)
Deutsch (German)
Español - España (Spanish - Spain)
Español - Latinoamérica (Spanish - Latin America)
Ελληνικά (Greek)
Français (French)
Italiano (Italian)
Bahasa Indonesia (Indonesian)
Magyar (Hungarian)
Nederlands (Dutch)
Norsk (Norwegian)
Polski (Polish)
Português (Portuguese - Portugal)
Português - Brasil (Portuguese - Brazil)
Română (Romanian)
Русский (Russian)
Suomi (Finnish)
Svenska (Swedish)
Türkçe (Turkish)
Tiếng Việt (Vietnamese)
Українська (Ukrainian)
Report a translation problem
When it's a company, money seems to be the only reason they operate. Don't know about other parts of the world, but small business enterprises are suffering here in Australia, seems the only businesses that survive are the corporations - their lower prices and the greedy desperation of the average person to find a bargain, means that shops like the corner deli or small enterprises, as in a game maker, go broke, while shareholders are the profiteers.
It basically sounds like the dude ran out of money and sold off part of his company for operating cash. And the investor pushed to release the game to recoup their investment. But what exactly is the problem with that????
Unfortunate ... sure. But unethical? I feel bad for the developer guy I guess but if he sold the majority of his company willingly then nobody forced him to do anything. Nobody sneaked away or stole anything.