Steamをインストール
ログイン
|
言語
简体中文（簡体字中国語）
繁體中文（繁体字中国語）
한국어 (韓国語)
ไทย (タイ語)
български (ブルガリア語)
Čeština（チェコ語）
Dansk (デンマーク語)
Deutsch (ドイツ語)
English (英語)
Español - España (スペイン語 - スペイン)
Español - Latinoamérica (スペイン語 - ラテンアメリカ)
Ελληνικά (ギリシャ語)
Français (フランス語)
Italiano (イタリア語)
Bahasa Indonesia（インドネシア語）
Magyar（ハンガリー語）
Nederlands (オランダ語)
Norsk (ノルウェー語)
Polski (ポーランド語)
Português（ポルトガル語－ポルトガル）
Português - Brasil (ポルトガル語 - ブラジル)
Română（ルーマニア語）
Русский (ロシア語)
Suomi (フィンランド語)
Svenska (スウェーデン語)
Türkçe (トルコ語)
Tiếng Việt (ベトナム語)
Українська (ウクライナ語)
翻訳の問題を報告
ルールとガイドライン
この投稿を報告する
it is a refreshing change! :D
anyway, linux in the past was not ready for games, the graphic cards and opengl support was lagging and even wine failed to support many needed calls. To use linux, people would need to learn about it and there was very few big games ported.
Today, modern graphic card support is usually very good (intel and amd it is really plug and play). Linux is now easy to use, in fact is easier than windows for people that never used computers... but most people already know windows and that makes anything different "hard" (just look at windows people using macos for the first time)...Linux can have many features that normal users will never know, but also do windows.
Games, we now have a lot and many big names. Steam made the important push and while some publishers still refuse to support linux, others are already supporting in all their recent games. The fact that they keep supporting even in new games show that good planing is enough to offset any extra costs of supporting linux. Even studios that have no knowledge in linux, can give feral and other porting companies and people permissions to port the game. Feral now porting the games to vulkan helped a lot in the performance, so the performance difference from the port is getting smaller each day. Games developed for multiplatforms have usually similar or even better performance in linux, but all depends of the code and tools used.
Anyway, i personally have almost 1300 linux games, have been playing many great games in linux, i do not have windows installed in any of my machines and i don't even use wine for several years... So when someone says that linux is not for games, i would say that they are stuck in the past. Yes, windows still have more advanced in game support, but they have a way bigger market share and way longer time in the game market, even broken APIs are workaround, but linux can do games too... Performance, all depends of the game code (quality/features/tech used)
Wine/Proton, Steam Play. Nuff said. I second what you said and will gladly buy one of your paintings for a reasonable price when I see you on the streets.
valve did the exact opposite with proton
https://www.protondb.com/app/814380
another windows game, that works day1 on linux
if you play it with proton, they see, that you are playing on linux and maybe they reconsider for the next project.. or at least use vulkan, so the performance with proton is much better
crutches? at indie games wou wont see any difference and sekiro has very low specs
the only difference you see is, that it installs some windows stuff at first launch
To those trolls: dudes, get a real job, get laid or do whatever else instead of trolling. Trolling is not cool.
Windows is only one, locked code, same kernel, and OS base software to everyone, so developers basically don't need to worry about OS issues, even so, many problems still happen.
Say Linux support is too generic because there are many different distributions, many kernel versions running, no NVIDIA/AMD true support for drivers (actually official are ♥♥♥♥), very tiny player base. Imagine a nightmare would be to support and troubleshoot users reports.
The first problem would be a huge lack of optimization due to many different distros. So, don't need to be smart to know why basically there are no games on Linux.
I'm not saying the OS is bad or anything, it's just not focused on games in an industry perspective for an obvious reason.
how does FERAL INTERACTIVE do it?
they porting games to linux and mac... sometimes way after the release and they still exist.
the time shadow of the tomb raider comes to linux it will be cheaper than now and they still making profit
AND i havent read anyone complaining about games not working.
FIRST: ferals and most of linux developers just program for UBUNTU and/or STEAMOS. so you dont have to bother with other distributions. write it in the specs and you dont have to support suse, or arch
SECOND: most distros are based on DEBIAN, so there shouldnt be any problems, no matter if you use mint, or ubuntu, or kubuntu, or elementary, or deepin, or zorin, or ...... they all have the same base
THIRD: firefox, chrome, libreoffice, etc work on every linux distro. why shouldnt games work like that? i mean there are a lot of linux games on steam and the newer ones just work, beause engines got better linux support, APIs became better, drivers are better, etc
And for me, Windows is bad OS in design and User Interaction which one must pay me to use.
Example, DOTNET ran faster on Linux after the initial port without performance enhancements. Where Microsoft had to performance enhance it for Windows to counter the Linux port.
I prefer to use an OS I can trust and that has proven itself; from embedded to desktop, server, and super computers by running most of the world you do and do not see.