Too much fun? No such thing! =)

Actually you make a good point. That is an exquisitely good comparison to the situation. FIFA and Plants vs. Zombies have about as much in common as AoE2 and
amount of reports and complaints, I just haven’t experienced them myself.

In my opinion, this game’s development has been handled extremely well and I have faith the team will continue to work with the

out]?"
[army of half-brained orcs] "lOl gIt gUd sCrUb"
Classic.

To OP: You are presenting an obvious common sense logic, but modern game devs pretty much refuse to do *anything* to clean up the
get much more enjoyment when you leave that toxic rabbit hole. [/quote]
I've had some bad experiences playing MP games. But in Age of Empires I mostly only met nice people. It doesn't matter whether you

Paxtoranius님이 먼저 게시:

An AI enemy builds out military buildings without requiring to mine stone at all or just 30 after a four hour game. Exceeds gold accumulation without having any relics, doesn't
bother to trade with anyone and can relentlessly spawn units and rebuild any building I destroy in an matter of minutes of course without any stone gathering once again. Seems a bit off!

DE's AI

yourself."
Completely useless and troll thing to say.

People paid for their food or games. They have a say in giving feedbacks and let the cook/game dev that they are not meeting the customer's needs
is how common the vil would wall himself in, or house himself in when building a series of walls/houses."
Never saw that on ai but at myselft :D

"They spent all this time writing atrocious AI script

Crossil님이 먼저 게시:

jonoliveira12님이 먼저 게시:

Camel Scouts are already in the game, now.
Gurjaras have them, and they are no UUs
, Winged Hussars, Savars and Legionaries don't have it.

I think the only instance of an armor class change is in case of Villager turning into the Flemish Militia (getting both infantry and unique unit

. [/quote]
game balancing usually does cater to the pros and that's how it should be as everything not pro is not fully developed in games
I dont even know if AoE2 uses Elo btw I think they use Glicko-2
about the overall winrate. balancing shouldn't just be about the pros, or else low elo winrates will be chaotic. [/quote]
Low elo winrates will always be chaotic though, and its common sense to balance a

beat him in a equal match (No walls unless it's a closed map,no towers,no castle drops until end of the game).
[/olist][/quote]

In ranked games with decent (1100+ Elo) human players feudal aggression is
common and fairly standard.
Humans can do much greater damage than extreme AI in feudal, because AI attacks houses instead of killing all your villagers mercilessly. So that is one point where play vs

. Verify your files in the Steam Library -> Age of Empires II -> Right click -> Properties -> Local files -> Verify.
b. Disable all your mods and restart the game after that.
c. Update your graphic drivers
and check for pending Windows updates.
d. Add the whole game folder to your antivirus exception list. C:\Program Files (x86)\Steam\steamapps\common\AoE2DE is the default
e. Close as many programs as

Kurminog님이 먼저 게시:

Smurfs are the most braindead players. In aoe they use smurfs becuase its too scary to lose elo for them. Most of them are chineses. Smurfs are nothing but
skilled enough/notices smth kinky is being used on them is quite entertaining(till yr on the receiving end of it but even then at least its a break from the common&predictable meta plays that rule the

Corrosion님이 먼저 게시:

your machine must belong in the garbage. duudoo head! see? i can be stupid too.

of course it's not on your end even though many other people can play it just
temperature IQ.

It's the only game I own having problems... Oh and the fact that they have already said something about the game not working with high end hardware, the UHD texture pack is broken, and