Install Steam
login
|
language
简体中文 (Simplified Chinese)
繁體中文 (Traditional Chinese)
日本語 (Japanese)
한국어 (Korean)
ไทย (Thai)
Български (Bulgarian)
Čeština (Czech)
Dansk (Danish)
Deutsch (German)
Español - España (Spanish - Spain)
Español - Latinoamérica (Spanish - Latin America)
Ελληνικά (Greek)
Français (French)
Italiano (Italian)
Bahasa Indonesia (Indonesian)
Magyar (Hungarian)
Nederlands (Dutch)
Norsk (Norwegian)
Polski (Polish)
Português (Portuguese - Portugal)
Português - Brasil (Portuguese - Brazil)
Română (Romanian)
Русский (Russian)
Suomi (Finnish)
Svenska (Swedish)
Türkçe (Turkish)
Tiếng Việt (Vietnamese)
Українська (Ukrainian)
Report a translation problem
AoE3 has very little SP content, and what little there is, is not very good.
AoE2 on the other hand, with all it's expansions over the years, have 100+ hours of content.
Ok but which one offers more single player hours? As I will only play against computer.
Looks very interesting, any recommended DLC for single player? Im mostly interested in Byzantine Empire.
Ironically, the little single player content it has in my opinion is the best part of AoE III: DE instead of multiplayer despite the fact I think single player is overall the best on AoE II: DE instead of AoE III: DE. AoE III: DE also has mods similar to AoE II: DE, but I am under the overall impression that AoE II: DE has better mods than this game. It was however a red flag I think that Knights of the Mediterranean would be the last dlc to AoE III: DE, because contrary to previous dlc it did not add any historical battles including even for the Italians.
AoE is a game about History, so on that basis I much prefer the AoE2 SP experience.
But I do respect the uniqueness of AoE III: DE civs in comparison to AoE II: DE when it comes to civ design, based on a later time period, tech tree, the use of cards, and home city which is why I overall like the campaigns and historical battles on AoE III: DE slightly more than AoE II: DE campaigns and historical battles despite being fewer in number. The full game of AoE III: DE contrary to the free to play version actually has 8 campaigns total (Blood, Ice, Steel, Japan, China, India, Fire, and shadow) and not just one (but only if you combine acts 1, 2, and 3 together and call that a campaign) or three campaigns. There is also Art of War and two tutorials that could be considered campaign material, but that is only bonus content, only plays a minor role in this game, and even when you combine 8 campaigns together along with Art of War and two tutorials that is still not nearly as many campaigns as AoE II: DE. So the pro of campaigns and historical battles on AoE III: DE is that they can be fun to play and for some people arguably more fun to play than any AoE II: DE campaign or historical battle, but the biggest con in comparison to AoE II: DE is that they are much fewer in numbers resulting in overall less play ability than AoE II: DE campaigns and historical battles. if someone can just simply ignore the historical inaccuracies of the campaigns and historical battles then AoE III: DE campaigns and historical battles can be fun to play.
I would also like to add as well that the first three campaigns on AoE III: DE being fictional is not accurate. It is actually historical fiction. War Chiefs expansion pack (but basegame on the full paid version with DE) is historical fiction as well.
If you are into the AoE3 experience with home cities and that style of play, the campaigns are decent but it lacks historical accuracy and is entirely fictional. If the historical accuracy aspect of AoE2 appeals to you for campaigns, AoE3 doesnt have that.