Install Steam
login
|
language
简体中文 (Simplified Chinese)
繁體中文 (Traditional Chinese)
日本語 (Japanese)
한국어 (Korean)
ไทย (Thai)
Български (Bulgarian)
Čeština (Czech)
Dansk (Danish)
Deutsch (German)
Español - España (Spanish - Spain)
Español - Latinoamérica (Spanish - Latin America)
Ελληνικά (Greek)
Français (French)
Italiano (Italian)
Bahasa Indonesia (Indonesian)
Magyar (Hungarian)
Nederlands (Dutch)
Norsk (Norwegian)
Polski (Polish)
Português (Portuguese - Portugal)
Português - Brasil (Portuguese - Brazil)
Română (Romanian)
Русский (Russian)
Suomi (Finnish)
Svenska (Swedish)
Türkçe (Turkish)
Tiếng Việt (Vietnamese)
Українська (Ukrainian)
Report a translation problem
Best DLC since the Raja's.
I'm actually surprised that people tend to genuinely be happy with the new campaigns. I was expecting they put as much effort into them as the new civs would imply.
(Personally I'd say a "pure" edition should toss out anyone not from the OG 1999 release)
There is no reason that campaign DLCs would not offer good RoI, we need to be unshackled from the need to add civs all the time and focus on more quality single-player content, i.e. full campaigns for civs that don't yet have one.
Very much agreed.
they are not gonna stop if money and positive reviews do not drop
I would bet AI was used extensively for all this. Given the half-assed nature of the whole idea, I'd be surprised if it wasn't.
Liao Dao
Simplied: 辽道 (Way of the Dao??) Should be 辽刀
Traditional: 遼刀
Fire Lancer
Simplied: 火枪骑兵 (Mounted Musketeer?? Hand Cannoneers are named 火枪兵!) Should be火 (Fire)长矛 (Lance) 兵
Traditional: 火長矛兵