Install Steam
login
|
language
简体中文 (Simplified Chinese)
繁體中文 (Traditional Chinese)
日本語 (Japanese)
한국어 (Korean)
ไทย (Thai)
Български (Bulgarian)
Čeština (Czech)
Dansk (Danish)
Deutsch (German)
Español - España (Spanish - Spain)
Español - Latinoamérica (Spanish - Latin America)
Ελληνικά (Greek)
Français (French)
Italiano (Italian)
Bahasa Indonesia (Indonesian)
Magyar (Hungarian)
Nederlands (Dutch)
Norsk (Norwegian)
Polski (Polish)
Português (Portuguese - Portugal)
Português - Brasil (Portuguese - Brazil)
Română (Romanian)
Русский (Russian)
Suomi (Finnish)
Svenska (Swedish)
Türkçe (Turkish)
Tiếng Việt (Vietnamese)
Українська (Ukrainian)
Report a translation problem
Yes, the game has become a hub since ROR. The grim reality is that you will be reminded by the cursed taskbar in the left.
Seriously have you ever read or research up BfG? Are you a ranked player only?
Your question in your last paragraph is weird. Of course I have read about it - that's what my entire post is about O_o
Edit: About the DLC I don't mind as long they benefits both main game, which seem to be the case for BfG.
What I want to discuss is questionable practices. I'm certain that dubious marketing of ROR and V&V leads to pretty much controversy arguments.
Edit: I do think at the end, customers should have choices on choosing or skipping whichever content they wants to play. It's less controversial and less people getting mad for nothing.
(https://www.ageofempires.com/news/pre-order-age-of-empires-ii-definitive-edition-chronicles-battle-for-greece/)
What we’ve been doing with DLCs like Animated Profile Icons, Victors and Vanquished, and now Chronicles: Battle for Greece, is a bit of experimenting. The AoE II: DE community is pretty big and spread out. Our most visible cohort tends to be our competitive community, tournament organizers, and streamers, but there’s a rather massive and understated majority of our players that show up week over week and month over month just to enjoy their favorite Campaigns. They love Campaign content exclusively, and they’re playing them over and over again – hard to blame them (that Attila Campaign, amiright???). There’s some Venn diagram overlap where many of you together are enjoying a lot of Skirmish matches, but the point is that it’s a big game with lots to do and therefore we’ve got many different interests to explore and service. It starts to become important for us to look for ways that we can push Campaign content and do new and interesting things, even if it means some variation in how we roll out a DLC (e.g. Civs not going into Ranked). So when we do something different like this, please don’t be alarmed – we’re just a happy tree growing new branches – the ones that have given you shade in times past are still there and we’ve got plenty of surprises waiting for you. Like, a lot. A lot a lot. Seriously. A lot a lot a lot.
Why would you buy another game taht is essentially 90% like teh game you already own, and compete with it, only to be moer expensive than it is as a DLC?
Haters are gonna hate, Spoiled Ubisoft players :D