Install Steam
login
|
language
简体中文 (Simplified Chinese)
繁體中文 (Traditional Chinese)
日本語 (Japanese)
한국어 (Korean)
ไทย (Thai)
Български (Bulgarian)
Čeština (Czech)
Dansk (Danish)
Deutsch (German)
Español - España (Spanish - Spain)
Español - Latinoamérica (Spanish - Latin America)
Ελληνικά (Greek)
Français (French)
Italiano (Italian)
Bahasa Indonesia (Indonesian)
Magyar (Hungarian)
Nederlands (Dutch)
Norsk (Norwegian)
Polski (Polish)
Português (Portuguese - Portugal)
Português - Brasil (Portuguese - Brazil)
Română (Romanian)
Русский (Russian)
Suomi (Finnish)
Svenska (Swedish)
Türkçe (Turkish)
Tiếng Việt (Vietnamese)
Українська (Ukrainian)
Report a translation problem
If you're a TG player and plan on playing 1v1s, the game uses your TG Elo as the starting point instead.
Also, as it's shown in the graph on https://ratings.aoe2.se/ - the top 50 % roughly formes around the starting value. If you e.g. lower the starting Elo from 1000 to 800, the 50 % will be eventually at 800.
They don't. The way it should work is they throw you those matches before giving you elo, not after.
pretty sure it has placement matches unless they changed it which I can't think of a reason why. The elo showing is more of a design choice. For example, league used to have hidden elo during placement, but now it shows. It doesn't change the outcome objectively.
I started from 1k elo, without any "check my level matches"
So the problem is the starting elo or are you still denying that placement game exist in aoe2?
I mean its been awhile but i remember that it does have placement games. AOE2 is not like other modern competitive games where elo is soft reset every season. You do the placement and u never have to do it again unlike other games where u do it every season. I remember the first 10 games only elo was visible and position in ladder wasn't which suggest that they are placement games. I can't find anything concrete on it, but there are numerous posts online suggesting that placement game is a thing. I could confirm it by making a smurf and playing some ranked game but too lazy. Maybe someone could fact check this.
https://www.reddit.com/r/aoe2/comments/112ctev/how_effective_are_ranked_placement_games_a_data/
Aoe2 insight also seems to confirm what I said. For 1v1 the first data point on the graph is 1.3k and likewise TG is 1.4k for my account. If placement game didn't exist then they should have tracked my progression from the start i.e. 1k elo. Like I said I remember the first 10 games, position in ladder wasn't displayed and this checks out with the information of aoe2 insight.
Also in order for elo matchmaking to work you need some baseline elo otherwise how would they match u? All placement game does is you have a bigger elo gain/loss during those matches. This effectively help shifts you faster to your true elo. You are still gaining/losing elo during these games.
In SC2 you didn't get any indication of where you are before you started the matches.
This is a problem as it makes psychologically push people into thinking, that they are bad in this game, because they need to lost a lot before finding their elo.
And in that regard the double elo, namely team elo is as rotten as Donald Trump.
For some people 100 games can be their whole career in AOE2, so yeah, no.
5 games are good enough. It worked for SC2 very well.
maybe I am still not getting it. You only lose a lot if you aren't good at the game. If I made a new acc and started from 1k again I did argue my chances of winning my first few games are quite high. Similarly if I was below avg and let's assume my rating was 800 elo then I would expect to lose more games. I don't see how we can give more wins to these ppl because someone have to take the L in matchmaking. You can't increase the overall winrate if that makes sense.
I guess you can lower the starting elo (disagree) so players that are doing placement win more, but then it doesn't do anything in the long as Floos has explained.
Contrary to The SIms 4 (which focuses very much so on openly supporting the LGBT+ community despite it being a very expensive game as well), the Age of Empires series is not really as much about politics as The Sims 4. Instead, it is a lot more about strategy, history lessons, and economy. Is their a player on multiplayer "specifically" named Donald Trump or Joe Biden? Their might be, but the chances of seeing a random player specifically named Joe Biden or Donald Trump on multiplayer are only slim at best and the entire series in general (including even AoE III: DE) does not really relate in any way to modern day politics.
Also, I have noob question. What is elo? I have seen this mentioned many times on Steam, but I do not even know what elo is.
What a useless post filled with self-hate. lol
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Elo_rating_system
I think it works great and have no complaints really. After the first 10 games you're matched up with people of a similar Elo (or rating.) 10 games is a a good chunk of time and seems like a lot, but it may be the ideal number for truly determining where you are in terms of skill. Maybe it could be tweaked, I don't know.
Come online and find out, James. Dip your toes in! The water is fine :)