Install Steam
login
|
language
简体中文 (Simplified Chinese)
繁體中文 (Traditional Chinese)
日本語 (Japanese)
한국어 (Korean)
ไทย (Thai)
Български (Bulgarian)
Čeština (Czech)
Dansk (Danish)
Deutsch (German)
Español - España (Spanish - Spain)
Español - Latinoamérica (Spanish - Latin America)
Ελληνικά (Greek)
Français (French)
Italiano (Italian)
Bahasa Indonesia (Indonesian)
Magyar (Hungarian)
Nederlands (Dutch)
Norsk (Norwegian)
Polski (Polish)
Português (Portuguese - Portugal)
Português - Brasil (Portuguese - Brazil)
Română (Romanian)
Русский (Russian)
Suomi (Finnish)
Svenska (Swedish)
Türkçe (Turkish)
Tiếng Việt (Vietnamese)
Українська (Ukrainian)
Report a translation problem
Also, he had to invest a lot of wood into those docks and fire ships. And fire ships don't do anything once you've won the pond.
Why would you make light cav instead of knights?
More town centres for more villagers for more gold to make more knights?
I can't see many reasons to use light cav over knights. But people make strategic blunders all the time.
People use knights all the time for raiding. In fact in every match I've played against a cavalry civ, They do one of two things. Go scouts into knights, no light cav. Go fast castle and knights. Why would this be any different for Poles who after a research pay 30g per knight.
400w 3500f 23 G 347S
i am not saying to go light cav, just saying is a great way to ditch food and blob the map killing vill