Install Steam
login
|
language
简体中文 (Simplified Chinese)
繁體中文 (Traditional Chinese)
日本語 (Japanese)
한국어 (Korean)
ไทย (Thai)
Български (Bulgarian)
Čeština (Czech)
Dansk (Danish)
Deutsch (German)
Español - España (Spanish - Spain)
Español - Latinoamérica (Spanish - Latin America)
Ελληνικά (Greek)
Français (French)
Italiano (Italian)
Bahasa Indonesia (Indonesian)
Magyar (Hungarian)
Nederlands (Dutch)
Norsk (Norwegian)
Polski (Polish)
Português (Portuguese - Portugal)
Português - Brasil (Portuguese - Brazil)
Română (Romanian)
Русский (Russian)
Suomi (Finnish)
Svenska (Swedish)
Türkçe (Turkish)
Tiếng Việt (Vietnamese)
Українська (Ukrainian)
Report a translation problem
One note, just because the history is interesting: the Legionary unit probably isn't the best representative for Byzantine infantry because it is a very strong unit. Only in the very early period can it really be said that the Romans had particularly effective infantry; by the time of say Nikephoros Phokas (10th century), the infantry was no longer a professional force and played second fiddle to the cavalry. Infantrymen were lightly armored and more resembled militia. It was not expected of the infantry to clash decisively with the enemy, but instead to serve as a rearguard bulwark protecting the archers and acting as a retreat point for the cavalry. I recommend checking out Eric McGeer's "Sowing the Dragon's Teeth" for more info.
And actually the Professional army was maintained into the 11th century until it started being defunded under the successors to Basil II like Romanos III Argyros. The idea that the infantry of the Roman army had been relegated to a militia is horrendously outdated. That might be true of the Akritai who were descended from the Limitanei and similar to a "militia" (Justinian I began defunding the Limitanei in the 550's) but it wasn't true of the "Thematic army" let alone the "Tagmata" (it should be noted as well that the traditional notion of the theme system has been disproven, we now know it was a reimplementation of a law passed by Valentinian II in 386 that allowed for poor families to group together fund a recruit, see the work of Haldon "A Context for Two Evil Deeds" and Salvatore Consentino notes that Charlemagne actually did it first in 808 while Nikephoros implemented it in 809). Hereditary service was tied to family, not to land, in the empire. Not until the Pronoia system, which is how most people think the Theme system worked, and that's implemented after Manzikert (Actually spelled Mantzikert, Manzikert is a slightly off transliteration of the Romeika) under Alexios Komnenos.
As for the Legionary/Centurion unit, I just like a little Roman flavour.