Install Steam
login
|
language
简体中文 (Simplified Chinese)
繁體中文 (Traditional Chinese)
日本語 (Japanese)
한국어 (Korean)
ไทย (Thai)
Български (Bulgarian)
Čeština (Czech)
Dansk (Danish)
Deutsch (German)
Español - España (Spanish - Spain)
Español - Latinoamérica (Spanish - Latin America)
Ελληνικά (Greek)
Français (French)
Italiano (Italian)
Bahasa Indonesia (Indonesian)
Magyar (Hungarian)
Nederlands (Dutch)
Norsk (Norwegian)
Polski (Polish)
Português (Portuguese - Portugal)
Português - Brasil (Portuguese - Brazil)
Română (Romanian)
Русский (Russian)
Suomi (Finnish)
Svenska (Swedish)
Türkçe (Turkish)
Tiếng Việt (Vietnamese)
Українська (Ukrainian)
Report a translation problem
Wow great answer!
There's way too many scenarios for me to ever replay them so I'll probably just go the hardest difficulty.
Seriously just do standard. A lot of achievements are impossible on hard I think. You only need to do one sundjata mission on hard for an achievement.
I'm specifically playing the Ivalio campaign, and so far it's impossible without any kind of cheat codes, not because of inexperience... but because you are constantly raided by big armies, while all you have is a couple of pikemen, low resources and no place to actually build up any kind of economy
so in conclussion.. I don't think it's a matter of AI.. it's more like a matter of how complex the campaigns are, and since the original ones are 20 years old, they seem like a walk in the park, while the new ones are simply a massacre
This difficulty in campaigns seems a classic problem of MP players of low lvl. Any average SP player in the campaign knows that with a good and well-positioned castle, a few walls, 20 crossbows, and half a dozen knights (to hunt trebuchets and cannons), you can handle the vast majority of missions even in Hard.