Should I just resign if anything goes wrong?

[Doom Sayer]

I am being frequently rolled with nothing i can do.
EDIT - (Wrong Solution): Either dont play or resign for barely any reason.
EDIT - (Right solution): Play art of war and get total gold.

[Grandaddypurple]

Geistermeister lähetti viestin:

Bla bla bla, more pathetic ♥♥♥♥♥♥♥♥ from a ruiner.

The 3 people that are in the team i was in before i resigned will care, whether you like it or not. In the end it will work the same way it worked in Dota 2 where they had to remove the option to just resign and leave and punish people for disconnecting. Because forcing people to play without ruining the game is the right way. You can cry about that all you want.

Really I don't think AoE2 multiplayer is a game for you. You should stick with playing against moderate/hard AI which is a more chill approach of the game (and that's what a lot of AoE2 owners do). Playing multiplayer requires patience and acceptance of losing, using losses as stepping stone to improve.
You seem to be rather impatient and give yourself way too much importance regarding your resigning abilities. In the end you're the "cancereous" type of person.

Also, recovering from tower rushes is definitly possible. Most of the times you'll struggle through feudal age and unless your opponent is straight up better than you (which happens, and it's OK), you'll get rid of the towers in early castle. After that, it's revenge time :)

[Doom Sayer]

Grandaddypurple lähetti viestin:

Geistermeister lähetti viestin:

Bla bla bla, more pathetic ♥♥♥♥♥♥♥♥ from a ruiner.

The 3 people that are in the team i was in before i resigned will care, whether you like it or not. In the end it will work the same way it worked in Dota 2 where they had to remove the option to just resign and leave and punish people for disconnecting. Because forcing people to play without ruining the game is the right way. You can cry about that all you want.

Really I don't think AoE2 multiplayer is a game for you. You should stick with playing against moderate/hard AI which is a more chill approach of the game (and that's what a lot of AoE2 owners do). Playing multiplayer requires patience and acceptance of losing, using losses as stepping stone to improve.
You seem to be rather impatient and give yourself way too much importance regarding your resigning abilities. In the end you're the "cancereous" type of person.

Also, recovering from tower rushes is definitly possible. Most of the times you'll struggle through feudal age and unless your opponent is straight up better than you (which happens, and it's OK), you'll get rid of the towers in early castle. After that, it's revenge time :)

Would help if ranked worked. I have lost 6+ times in a row. Currently at 33% winrate.

[TheDiaper]

Degeneracy lähetti viestin:

Grandaddypurple lähetti viestin:

Really I don't think AoE2 multiplayer is a game for you. You should stick with playing against moderate/hard AI which is a more chill approach of the game (and that's what a lot of AoE2 owners do). Playing multiplayer requires patience and acceptance of losing, using losses as stepping stone to improve.
You seem to be rather impatient and give yourself way too much importance regarding your resigning abilities. In the end you're the "cancereous" type of person.

Also, recovering from tower rushes is definitly possible. Most of the times you'll struggle through feudal age and unless your opponent is straight up better than you (which happens, and it's OK), you'll get rid of the towers in early castle. After that, it's revenge time :)

Would help if ranked worked. I have lost 6+ times in a row. Currently at 33% winrate.

It worked pretty well, all your opponents were like 800-ish. Even tho civs dont really matter on low level, you went mayans on four lakes and britons on acropolis.

[Doom Sayer]

HongeyKong (Busty Girl) lähetti viestin:

Degeneracy lähetti viestin:

Would help if ranked worked. I have lost 6+ times in a row. Currently at 33% winrate.

It worked pretty well, all your opponents were like 800-ish. Even tho civs dont really matter on low level, you went mayans on four lakes and britons on acropolis.

Nothing you just said meant anything. Ranked should be ranked. Or are civs severely unblanced? either way i give up with this game because its cancer. Or maybe devs dont know what ranked matchmaking is supposed to be.

Fighting people of relatively equal skill. Not losing 78% of the time.

[TheDiaper]

Degeneracy lähetti viestin:

HongeyKong (Busty Girl) lähetti viestin:

It worked pretty well, all your opponents were like 800-ish. Even tho civs dont really matter on low level, you went mayans on four lakes and britons on acropolis.

Nothing you just said meant anything. Ranked should be ranked. Or are civs severely unblanced? either way i give up with this game because its cancer.

Maybe let me make it more clear:
(1) Losing six games in a row is nothing, everyone has their bad days. Even nicov, the #1 on the current ladder and a top10 player, have had losing streak in the past.
https://aoe2.net/#profile-76561198027378107

(2) Maybe your elo still havent reached your real level, you might get a 5050 when you go further lower. Yes you might just be that bad.

(3) Water is essential on four lakes while mobility is essential on acropolis.

[Grandaddypurple]

Yea I started playing after watching looots of pro's games so when I started I had poor execution but enough knowledge to go on a 25 winning streak. When I started feeling invincible, matchmaking put me up against stronger players and for 2 days, I lost ALL of my games (20ish). After that, it's been pretty stable. So Matchmaking works, and losing a lot of games in a row can happen no matter your level.
Now I see on AoE2.net that your rank is in the bottom 2k, I suggest you do some research on strategies, build orders, civs choice, rebind your hotkeys and all that good stuff. Just doing that will make you climb the ladder like crazy.
P.S : Btw when I said "Aoe2 multiplayer is not a game for you", I wasn't talking to you but to the other guy ranting like crazy

[Doom Sayer]

Grandaddypurple lähetti viestin:

Yea I started playing after watching looots of pro's games so when I started I had poor execution but enough knowledge to go on a 25 winning streak. When I started feeling invincible, matchmaking put me up against stronger players and for 2 days, I lost ALL of my games (20ish). After that, it's been pretty stable. So Matchmaking works, and losing a lot of games in a row can happen no matter your level.
Now I see on AoE2.net that your rank is in the bottom 2k, I suggest you do some research on strategies, build orders, civs choice, rebind your hotkeys and all that good stuff. Just doing that will make you climb the ladder like crazy.

I just spent like two+ hours attempting gold in early economy art of war and couldnt.

[Grandaddypurple]

Degeneracy lähetti viestin:

Grandaddypurple lähetti viestin:

Yea I started playing after watching looots of pro's games so when I started I had poor execution but enough knowledge to go on a 25 winning streak. When I started feeling invincible, matchmaking put me up against stronger players and for 2 days, I lost ALL of my games (20ish). After that, it's been pretty stable. So Matchmaking works, and losing a lot of games in a row can happen no matter your level.
Now I see on AoE2.net that your rank is in the bottom 2k, I suggest you do some research on strategies, build orders, civs choice, rebind your hotkeys and all that good stuff. Just doing that will make you climb the ladder like crazy.

I just spent like two+ hours attempting gold in early economy art of war and couldnt.

Don't go for gold medals yet. TheViper (uncontested best player in the world) missed the gold medals on his first tries of two of the Art of War scenarios. Aim for Bronze, then try some multiplayer. When you feel you're getting better, aim for silver etc.

[Sheng Long]

Really in team game every player playing independ if you been attack 1v1 defend by your own ways , if you are in 2 v 1 i gonna arrive help you this is how it's work. Every team game is an adition of multiple 1v1 like in football at low skill . Why , because your random player and dont even have the time to make a real strategy .

[Sheng Long]

And if you dont wanna play for win , don't go ranked easy as that.

[Ducks on Fire]

Geistermeister lähetti viestin:

Just resign and dont give the ruiners that go with retarded strategies like TC rushes or tower rushes any more time to play. Deny them a game, simple as that.

Considering the fact that those strategies are supposed to end the game quickly you're not really doing anything but giving them the win they wanted in the first place. But if you need to feel like you are getting the last laugh go ahead I guess.

[SlothPaladin]

Geistermeister doesn't play 1v1, if you look at their AoE2.net profile they only play unranked and team games.

Yet they quite at the first rush and call other people ruiners, it's one thing in a 1v1 but a whole different thing in a team game.

@Degeneracy
And I find low elo matchmaking is better if you choose the right hours to play, I find good games just go out the window if I play much past 11pm Pacific Time

[🍮]

Geistermeister lähetti viestin:

ToWeR rUsHiNg iS FiNe

Yeah no whatever, you are just ending games before they have even begun, its pure cancer. Not gonna play with such people. Go play multiplayer with other ruiners, i will just resign and deny you any further playtime.

the game has begun when the timer is at 1 second. you cant take being able to boom with villagers for granted. defense is always necessary. scouting is how you prevent it or you just move your vills away from from wherever the tower is. i dont think its fair to tell korean and japanese players not to tower rush because it means they cant use their civ bonuses while you can use yours. any other civ that tower rushes is going to be less effective and easier to counter. some players use treaties because they cant handle a real game. that will just make you a permanoob. rushing of any type is a valid tactic. its up to the devs and not the players to balance things to be fair. as a player you just try to win or whatever you want to do.

Geistermeister lähetti viestin:

I dont care, i will keep going into games and leave as soon as I see that buillshit going on. If it ruins the game for the enemy or my team then good. Over time people will learn not to do it or stop playing multiplayer. In the long run, I will have my will.

youll have your will if it worked that way but it doesnt. when you quit as soon as someone tower rushes theyre glad you did and theyre just glad they got the win. the reality is that some players only care about winning and nothing else. hongeykong is one of those for example and its obvious because hes always telling people to go play ranked and to git guud for example. he also is very condescending and rude. he also has a toxic attitude toward all the other players and no desire to have civil discussion about anything on here. basically hes a tryhard and a troll. there are quite a few of those playing competitive games. many of us sane people though are just trying to play a game and have fun. so i can relate to your games being ruined by tower rushing. i always play with standard game rules. no special rules for noobs or anything. so i have no problem with tower rushing. in the long run youre only hurting youself as a player by trying to make special rules and not just playing the game as is. thats what i mean by people being permanoobs.

Grandaddypurple lähetti viestin:

Really I don't think AoE2 multiplayer is a game for you. You should stick with playing against moderate/hard AI which is a more chill approach of the game (and that's what a lot of AoE2 owners do). Playing multiplayer requires patience and acceptance of losing, using losses as stepping stone to improve.
You seem to be rather impatient and give yourself way too much importance regarding your resigning abilities. In the end you're the "cancereous" type of person.

Also, recovering from tower rushes is definitly possible. Most of the times you'll struggle through feudal age and unless your opponent is straight up better than you (which happens, and it's OK), you'll get rid of the towers in early castle. After that, it's revenge time :)

^ this is how i think. also i never stop getting a kick out of ragers in games. if you cant handle losing then its your problem. if i can make people rage in a game ill do it all day long. its fun. if youre raging its you thats the problem. on the other hand if youre toxic all the time toward people on the forums and in the game like honkeydong then youre just bad for the community and really should only be playing by yourself.

[Doom Sayer]

Grandaddypurple lähetti viestin:

Degeneracy lähetti viestin:

I just spent like two+ hours attempting gold in early economy art of war and couldnt.

Don't go for gold medals yet. TheViper (uncontested best player in the world) missed the gold medals on his first tries of two of the Art of War scenarios. Aim for Bronze, then try some multiplayer. When you feel you're getting better, aim for silver etc.

Nah at this point im tired of this crap. I wont go into MP again until I have at least attempted Gold in all of them. I managed to get it in early economy one after like 50+ tries.

[ʙᴜɴ.ᴇ]

yes its more fun not to play.