Wats ur benchmark score?

[ShakeNBakeUK]

***UPDATE 17/02/20 - Got a 3700X ^_^ re-ran benchmark, got 1286.2 now :3 1440p/Ultra - this CPU is nuts XD



I can barely scrape above 1000 with an i5 quad at 4GHz and a 1070 xd
What kind of scores are you guys getting with what rigs???

EDIT:
owait my overclock was disabled xd
i tried running again, settings = low and 1080p.
scored 1114.8 now :3

looks like framerate is VERY CPU DEPENDENT!

https://steamcommunity.com/sharedfiles/filedetails/?id=1912996106

[PhoenixExplorer777]

I got 986 although the thing played perfectly. So I changed the resolution and passed, then changed the resolution back :P

[Nalavv]

Score : 1138.2

I7 6700
GTX 1660 TI
8GB RAM

[Marcos]

ShakeNBakeUK님이 먼저 게시:

Omnislash님이 먼저 게시:

I did the test again and got 1152,6
with i5 7600k + 1050ti
on 1080p with ultra settings

clock speed of ur 7600k?

4ghz

[Chriz]

Pimbox님이 먼저 게시:

Why the game use only 1 core? My Xeon is crying....

The Game has to be deterministic

[Mr. Petrucci]

Score: 1166.1

4790k
1080 TI
16GB DDR3 RAM
WQHD

Highest graphics, but enhanced option turned off

[ShakeNBakeUK]

Omnislash님이 먼저 게시:

ShakeNBakeUK님이 먼저 게시:

clock speed of ur 7600k?

4ghz

thats mad that you score higher than me when my gfx technically has double the processing power of yours LOL

[Marcos]

ShakeNBakeUK님이 먼저 게시:

Omnislash님이 먼저 게시:

4ghz

thats mad that you score higher than me when my gfx technically has double the processing power of yours LOL

maybe this benchmark has problems

[Cyberlisk]

I feel like the benchmark test in game doesn't change regardless of your settings except for UHD Pack on or not . I don't know , I get around 1100(40-45 FPS) score regardless what settings I choose before running the test. [GTX 1080 , 24 GB RAM , i7 , 144hz 1920x1800 Monitor]

Or is Benchmark always supposed to just test your system at max? Regardless. 45 FPS for a 1080 just doesn't seem right.

[AkaalElite]

Running at 4k with UHD pack
2080ti OC'ed
7800X OC'ed to 4.8ghz
32gb ddr4 ram

score: 1155.9 ????.....

[6480]

Cyberlisk님이 먼저 게시:

I feel like the benchmark test in game doesn't change regardless of your settings except for UHD Pack on or not . I don't know , I get around 1100(40-45 FPS) score regardless what settings I choose before running the test. [GTX 1080 , 24 GB RAM , i7 , 144hz 1920x1800 Monitor]

Or is Benchmark always supposed to just test your system at max? Regardless. 45 FPS for a 1080 just doesn't seem right.

Are you monitoring your system load? I get only around 50% usage with 30FPS.

[Cyberlisk]

6480님이 먼저 게시:

Cyberlisk님이 먼저 게시:

I feel like the benchmark test in game doesn't change regardless of your settings except for UHD Pack on or not . I don't know , I get around 1100(40-45 FPS) score regardless what settings I choose before running the test. [GTX 1080 , 24 GB RAM , i7 , 144hz 1920x1800 Monitor]

Or is Benchmark always supposed to just test your system at max? Regardless. 45 FPS for a 1080 just doesn't seem right.

Are you monitoring your system load? I get only around 50% usage with 30FPS.

25% CPU usage , 20% GPU, like 10GB of RAM though lol

[Jig McGalliger]

1122.8

I'm maxing out graphics with the HD pack at 1440p on an R7 3700x/RTX 2080 (both water cooled) and 16 GB of RAM and the game is installed to me NVMe PCI SSD.

Even with this overkill rig, my average FPS is about 30 in the benchmark (which is indeed a full map of 8 players outside of the camera view), using my system monitoring tools I can see that the highest GPU usage is only 32% and there are high spikes in frametime. What is pretty strange is that my system RAM is maxing out at 15666 MB peak and avg of 15342.

My CPU usage shows only 1 thread being used at about 80%, another at about 50%, and a third spiking only momentarily to 80% once or twice during the benchmark.

All this leads to the poor performance being entirely memory bound, is this a known issue? Is this benchmark supposed to be only a worst case scenario with of 8 players each with populations 300-500 or so?

[Kinvadren]

Very interesting that the scores don't seem to change much at all no matter how good your hardware is. For me, going from Medium to Ultra settings makes no difference on my score, though I use default textures. I also noticed that CPU and GPU usage never goes all that high (30 to 60%).

I get a score of about 1100 at 1920x1080 resolution.

CPU: Intel i7-4790 3.60 GHz, Boost 4.0 GHz (awesome for its time but a number of years old now)
GPU: Nvidia Geforce 1050 TI

Surprisingly, my brother has a much better computer and he scores only slightly better. His stats are...

CPU: AMD Ryzen 7 3700X 3.60 GHz, Boost 4.4 GHz (new this year)
GPU: Nvidia Geforce 1080 TI

[Jig McGalliger]

I presume they don't go much above 1200, if at all and without much scaling. So maybe think of it as a 800-1400 scale, similar to SAT scores .

AkaalElite and Mallenator had better scores, probably because their RAM. Though I wish they gave a more in depth monitoring analysis to reveal where their bottleneck was.

[thettalos]

i score about 800 even after changing the resolution but the game is almost unplayable