Age of Empires II: Definitive Edition

Age of Empires II: Definitive Edition

查看统计:
Basileus Minos 2019 年 11 月 14 日 上午 1:04
Magyar Huszar and Wings
Okay guys. Whats up with the magyar hussar getting wings? Whats the point of it? In the forgotten they didn't have any and they looked like how they supposed to. Now for some reason they felt like adding some on them?

Might as well rename the civ to poland play sabatton in the background and ♥♥♥♥ historical accuracy. I know it might sound stupid but it really pisses me off. Just remove the ♥♥♥♥♥♥♥ wings please. Magyar hussars didn't have wings.
< >
正在显示第 16 - 22 条,共 22 条留言
Basileus Minos 2019 年 11 月 17 日 下午 2:05 
Was there ever a Hussar that didn't have wings? I thought its just a generic top tier cav unit like the Paladin that had the same model for every race

https://vignette.wikia.nocookie.net/ageofempires/images/8/84/AoF_Magyar_Huszar_All_Angles.jpg/revision/latest?cb=20150131084641
Basileus Minos 2019 年 11 月 17 日 下午 2:07 
Vikings never had horns on their helmets unless it was ceremonial. Guess they should take those out of the portrait to right?

The difference is Hungarian hussars didnt wear wings at all, not even ceremonial ones. So i guess you made my argument for me.

Im sure vikings didnt wear wings either. Would you be happier if they did?
最后由 Basileus Minos 编辑于; 2019 年 11 月 17 日 下午 2:07
G0dr1ckGr1n 2020 年 5 月 24 日 上午 12:37 
引用自 Don't Google p*rn
Vikings never had horns on their helmets unless it was ceremonial. Guess they should take those out of the portrait to right?

Well then, don't forget to also name them Islander Viking, and deprive them of their "viking" nationality, assigning them to Island.

Or, to show it even more correct, change Samurai to Vietkong Samauri and made them Vietnamese. I'm pretty sure any japanese culture endorser will be ok with that for sure, 'cause it's just so small thing, and why all the nitpicking have so much place...

More so, Hussar should have Cataphract bonuses, 'cause they were the wreckage of the infantry, and devs gave them bonuses vs siege units?
It takes either ignorance or stupidity to do such a thing. Maybe they've smoked too much weed, Idk.
I think the answer to the problem could be the Britton Longbowmen having bonuses only vs the buildings, that should be just about right.

And I hope CDPREDs will snap the xbox game studios nose, making fun of them some day in the form of some easter egg. That could do the justice.
Basileus Minos 2020 年 5 月 24 日 上午 2:17 
引用自 G0dr1ckGr1n
引用自 Don't Google p*rn
Vikings never had horns on their helmets unless it was ceremonial. Guess they should take those out of the portrait to right?
More so, Hussar should have Cataphract bonuses, 'cause they were the wreckage of the infantry, and devs gave them bonuses vs siege units?
It takes either ignorance or stupidity to do such a thing. Maybe they've smoked too much weed, Idk.
I think the answer to the problem could be the Britton Longbowmen having bonuses only vs the buildings, that should be just about right.

Hussars were never good against infantry unless they were ranged. Wouldn't make any sense to give hussars cataphract bonuses. And about viking horns, they also had them in hd edition, magyar huszars on the other hand they didn't have it. Until now they decided that every hussar unit be it vanila or magyar huszar shall have wings cos why the ♥♥♥♥ not.
Krysol 2020 年 8 月 7 日 上午 2:34 
引用自 Basileus Minos
引用自 G0dr1ckGr1n
More so, Hussar should have Cataphract bonuses, 'cause they were the wreckage of the infantry, and devs gave them bonuses vs siege units?
It takes either ignorance or stupidity to do such a thing. Maybe they've smoked too much weed, Idk.
I think the answer to the problem could be the Britton Longbowmen having bonuses only vs the buildings, that should be just about right.

Hussars were never good against infantry unless they were ranged. Wouldn't make any sense to give hussars cataphract bonuses. And about viking horns, they also had them in hd edition, magyar huszars on the other hand they didn't have it. Until now they decided that every hussar unit be it vanila or magyar huszar shall have wings cos why the ♥♥♥♥ not.

To be fair, polish hussars were heavy cavalry that fought by charging the enemy formation. They were effective against pikes. Their lances were the most important part of their gear (ignoring the horse here). These lances were ~5 meters long - similar to the pike length. By this logic, cataphract bonuses wouldn't be that far from reality
Basileus Minos 2020 年 8 月 7 日 上午 6:30 
引用自 Krysol
引用自 Basileus Minos

Hussars were never good against infantry unless they were ranged. Wouldn't make any sense to give hussars cataphract bonuses. And about viking horns, they also had them in hd edition, magyar huszars on the other hand they didn't have it. Until now they decided that every hussar unit be it vanila or magyar huszar shall have wings cos why the ♥♥♥♥ not.

To be fair, polish hussars were heavy cavalry that fought by charging the enemy formation. They were effective against pikes. Their lances were the most important part of their gear (ignoring the horse here). These lances were ~5 meters long - similar to the pike length. By this logic, cataphract bonuses wouldn't be that far from reality

Magyar huszar's lance was important too. But they weren't a heavy calvary and it's not polish hussars we are talking about, its feudal hungarian hussars who didn't have stupid wings. Polish and hungarian hussars were even recuited differently and they dont share much in common other than the word hussar and that hungarian hussars inspired the polish winged ones.
trulias 2020 年 8 月 8 日 下午 1:24 
"winged elephant" :D cannot be explained better :D count me in in the anti-winged hussar team to :D
< >
正在显示第 16 - 22 条,共 22 条留言
每页显示数: 1530 50

发帖日期: 2019 年 11 月 14 日 上午 1:04
回复数: 22