Assetto Corsa Competizione

Assetto Corsa Competizione

TonaZ May 16, 2020 @ 12:04pm
VR: situation
I got a 2080ti and a Ryzen7 3800X and 32GB RAM.
I should definetely play this max settings in VR.
From what i hear, this is not the situation.
Still ZERO vr optimization.
So i still refuse to buy this.
Any VR users confirm?
< >
Showing 1-15 of 35 comments
BBernes 76 May 16, 2020 @ 12:52pm 
My computer is nuber 60 on the VRmark world record list and it is not enough for 45 fps in ACCon low settings.
HTS MrHumphries May 16, 2020 @ 2:13pm 
Originally posted by TonaZ:
I got a 2080ti and a Ryzen7 3800X and 32GB RAM.
I should definetely play this max settings in VR.
From what i hear, this is not the situation.
Still ZERO vr optimization.
So i still refuse to buy this.
Any VR users confirm?


Nobody can play it with max settings in VR.
But with that PC you should still be able to get a good VR experience.
Are you really not going to bother with ACC VR if you cant 'max' it?

-I've upgraded to a RTX 2080 Super and Ryzen 3700x and im finally satisfied i can play this in VR,although it is a balancing act with the graphical settings to get acceptable performance and clarity.-
Blood Monarch May 17, 2020 @ 5:53am 
With a 2080ti you can get VR looking reasonable, certainly no where near bad, to the point its unplayable
odiZ_____ May 17, 2020 @ 6:40am 
i use 50 % res and 200% pixel. looks ok 90 fps steady shadows on med
goobMB May 17, 2020 @ 8:49am 
After a long long battle I managed to run ACC VR just great, with nice visuals too. Valve Index, Ryzen 3700x, RTX2080TI.

What I did was I went off the classic routine "ingame res down, ingame SS up" and let the ingame SS at 100 while cranking steamSS up. Decided to use forced motion smoothing at 120Hz which gives barely noticeable glitches (these are mostly hidden behind AA ghosting anyway, but I can see it only if I really focus on it. Most noticeable are edges of side rear mirrors and windshield middle stays - like these in Ferrari - and unfortunately waterdrops on the windshield during rain. But I can really live with them, for example transparency meshes in DR2.0 annoy me much much more) but delivers great value for graphics settings.

My actual settings are 82 ingame res, 240 steamSS, temporal epic, shadows epic/epic, sharpness 240. Other effects are mid to epic but foliage and mirrors - turned it to lowest.

And of course used modified engine.ini.

The image is the crispiest I have ever managed to get while having no jaggies (in terms of VR, of course). Distance boards are perfectly readable etc.

Note I do just practice and online races, no AI races (I suppose these settings are too high for offline AI).
Freak May 17, 2020 @ 10:32am 
Cool story bro.......Bye!
Eric Weijers May 17, 2020 @ 1:41pm 
sorry to say...., but both Iracing and RF2 eat this one alive when it comes to VR optimisation. Can be a cool and less exciting thing for screen only users....But in the long run it will bite you in the butt...The Tyre model and FFB feel is great btw, very convincing. Now only some FPS headroom left....
rola May 17, 2020 @ 4:17pm 
Originally posted by Eric Weijers:
sorry to say...., but both Iracing and RF2 eat this one alive when it comes to VR optimisation. Can be a cool and less exciting thing for screen only users....But in the long run it will bite you in the butt...The Tyre model and FFB feel is great btw, very convincing. Now only some FPS headroom left....
You have to remember that ACC graphics are on another level vs iRacing or ESPECIALLY rF2.

You are trying to play a brand new game with great graphics and CPU intensive physics, with tech that taxes your PC more than running the game at 4K.

While the VR optimization could be a little better, there is a limit to how much one can optimize a game without downgrading the graphics.
rola May 17, 2020 @ 4:22pm 
You can barely get a stable 90fps at max graphics, at 4K with a 2080 Ti in the new COD MW, which is a competitive shooter made to run fairly well but have great graphics.

Is that game unoptimized because even in such a competitive game you cant always keep over 100fps at 4K? No. Its just a new game and you should stop setting unrealistic expectations.
PsyloT May 17, 2020 @ 7:16pm 
kevinkennedy May 19, 2020 @ 8:50am 
you are recording your monitor screen display not what your rift display looks like in the rift , and there are lots of ppl who it works well and lots who it does not
Litva May 25, 2020 @ 11:47am 
I got the game but did not try in VR, will do soon
My specks is 1080ti and pimax 5k+
BisterMungle May 26, 2020 @ 2:28am 
i use 1080ti best looking VR game by far, you are missing out forget 90fps but youll still have a great time on the best racing game.
27Luis May 26, 2020 @ 3:10am 
I got better FPS by keeping the Resolution and VR pixel density at 100%( avoids any upscaling or downscaling ) and then finding a good default SS in oculus tray tool(1.1 or 1.0 is perfect for me).

my logic being, dont let ACC handle any of the upscaling or downscaling coz oculus or steam vr can do it better.
goobMB May 26, 2020 @ 3:21am 
Originally posted by 27.Luis:
my logic being, dont let ACC handle any of the upscaling or downscaling coz oculus or steam vr can do it better.
Exactly this. As soon as I didn't follow general hints and tried steamVR SS instead I entered the paradise :D. I am still using motion smoothing though (120Hz forced) because occassional glitches (car shadows, wipers etc) are worthy tradeoff for high-epic visuals for me.
< >
Showing 1-15 of 35 comments
Per page: 1530 50

Date Posted: May 16, 2020 @ 12:04pm
Posts: 35