Установить Steam
войти
|
язык
简体中文 (упрощенный китайский)
繁體中文 (традиционный китайский)
日本語 (японский)
한국어 (корейский)
ไทย (тайский)
Български (болгарский)
Čeština (чешский)
Dansk (датский)
Deutsch (немецкий)
English (английский)
Español - España (испанский)
Español - Latinoamérica (латиноам. испанский)
Ελληνικά (греческий)
Français (французский)
Italiano (итальянский)
Bahasa Indonesia (индонезийский)
Magyar (венгерский)
Nederlands (нидерландский)
Norsk (норвежский)
Polski (польский)
Português (португальский)
Português-Brasil (бразильский португальский)
Română (румынский)
Suomi (финский)
Svenska (шведский)
Türkçe (турецкий)
Tiếng Việt (вьетнамский)
Українська (украинский)
Сообщить о проблеме с переводом
Bulgaria, Romania, Czechoslovakia, Hungary, Poland, Yugoslavia and the German Democratic Republic all produced weapons domestically. Over 20 countries used the Czech-made VZ.58 as a sample of their global influence. Similarly, we knew Denmark, Sweden, Belgium and Austria to have been major arms exporters despite a small size, and Sweden famously cut off supply of the M45 Carl Gustav when they learned of the United States' intent to utilize the platform in the Vietnam War.
Really, at it's barest, the ability to manufacture another end-product for profit would be a suitable addition to the game that allows diversity in manufacture. The 'global repercussions' and 'diplomacy' need not even be considered.
Regarding military
Well i agree with other players that "war and fighting " do not fit into the game.
But i dare to say it would be interesting if we could build military aps's, tanks, ships, planes, helicopters and export them for profit.. AND maybe there could be some kind of end game kind of gameplay where forign politics become a thing.. Example the east and west collide and to counter a west treat the player get orders to produce 100 tanks before x year and for that the player get a rewards such as higher steel prices for 5 years and if they fail lower steel prices for 5 years. ( player should be able to say yes/no to missions)
Alternative forign politics could also sometimes come with mission such as export xxxxx tons of corn and if the player can do it then get x reward for x years.
But such kind of gameplay might not be for everyone, in that case if a player say no they should just be able to play the ordinary game and do what they like without reward or being punished.
ps.. I think a little navy with ships and submarines will look awesome and show of the republics might.. maybe it could be used as forign politics points of power somehow.
BUT we should be able to shoot.. its a peacefull game. Maybe there should be some kind of maintenance cost so no player can build a gigantic military. ;-)
If I really needed to make the case, I could argue that anybody living in rural Montana with a million bucks could start the firearms production and it'd take less than 50 people. They'd probably say "ha, less than that" on both accounts.
See my point, it would be a feasible mechanic to add :D
Yes, space program would add more products/things to do, but so would a zillion far more relevant and reasonable industries. I haven't seen anybody address why space should be added rather than more practical options. The whole 'it would be fun' thing is so ... well, just groundless, since fun is totally subjective and again it could apply to other industries just as much.