Steam'i Yükleyin
giriş
|
dil
简体中文 (Basitleştirilmiş Çince)
繁體中文 (Geleneksel Çince)
日本語 (Japonca)
한국어 (Korece)
ไทย (Tayca)
Български (Bulgarca)
Čeština (Çekçe)
Dansk (Danca)
Deutsch (Almanca)
English (İngilizce)
Español - España (İspanyolca - İspanya)
Español - Latinoamérica (İspanyolca - Latin Amerika)
Ελληνικά (Yunanca)
Français (Fransızca)
Italiano (İtalyanca)
Bahasa Indonesia (Endonezce)
Magyar (Macarca)
Nederlands (Hollandaca)
Norsk (Norveççe)
Polski (Lehçe)
Português (Portekizce - Portekiz)
Português - Brasil (Portekizce - Brezilya)
Română (Rumence)
Русский (Rusça)
Suomi (Fince)
Svenska (İsveççe)
Tiếng Việt (Vietnamca)
Українська (Ukraynaca)
Bir çeviri sorunu bildirin
Too large areas you need to scale down equally so they are somewhat recognizable. 2-5x scale down is not that hard, but imagine even only Czech republic fitted in 20x20 square km space. That country has around 600 km in width iirc, so it would mean to scale down EVERYTHING by 30 times. It would be awful result.
Sněžka, highest CZ mountain, has 1620m height; lowest point is 115 m over the see level. That is ca 1500m difference; divide that by 30 and you have THE WHOLE MAP with maximum of 50m height difference. That is really bad idea. You can try to compensate by scaling it less on vertical values, so the span would be not 50m but maybe 150? 200? You cannot do much, though, as the area is barely recognizable afterwards anyway and would feel cramped. And any "terrain softening" would erase whole former hill ranges etc.
Do Prague region. Do Moravia. Do other parts, but only parts, so they sort-of stay playable and recognizable. Not a whole republic.