Install Steam
login
|
language
简体中文 (Simplified Chinese)
繁體中文 (Traditional Chinese)
日本語 (Japanese)
한국어 (Korean)
ไทย (Thai)
Български (Bulgarian)
Čeština (Czech)
Dansk (Danish)
Deutsch (German)
Español - España (Spanish - Spain)
Español - Latinoamérica (Spanish - Latin America)
Ελληνικά (Greek)
Français (French)
Italiano (Italian)
Bahasa Indonesia (Indonesian)
Magyar (Hungarian)
Nederlands (Dutch)
Norsk (Norwegian)
Polski (Polish)
Português (Portuguese - Portugal)
Português - Brasil (Portuguese - Brazil)
Română (Romanian)
Русский (Russian)
Suomi (Finnish)
Svenska (Swedish)
Türkçe (Turkish)
Tiếng Việt (Vietnamese)
Українська (Ukrainian)
Report a translation problem
My advice is to build specialized construction offices specifically for maintenance in each zone. They don't even need to be that big.
I think he meant: “The player starts a populated map, then only cares about the city of Leszcie, later he wants to start expanding the second city. Then the player realizes that after 2 years (iG) the second city fell apart.", even though he was not active at all in the area of the second city.
Is this decline normal then? (assuming he hasn't actually started any activities there)
Sorry, I realize my post may have sounded sarcastic, I didn't mean it to be.
All I mean to say is that I like the way things are currently. I don't think village buildings have maintenance activated, though. If they're crumbling, they might be modded buildings. Maintenance is one of those things that really sneaks up on you.
No problem :)
They don't? I didn't pay attention actually but I would just prefer to have things consistent - then it's fine.
Yes, maintenance looks like something that requires planning ahead since the very beginning.
That's exactly my situation. I started with 5 villages, but only activated one. I could build 4 more construction offices with it's trucks and everything to mantain all 4 innactivated cities but i'm playing on hard mode and that could just kill my small surplus