安装 Steam
登录
|
语言
繁體中文(繁体中文)
日本語(日语)
한국어(韩语)
ไทย(泰语)
български(保加利亚语)
Čeština(捷克语)
Dansk(丹麦语)
Deutsch(德语)
English(英语)
Español-España(西班牙语 - 西班牙)
Español - Latinoamérica(西班牙语 - 拉丁美洲)
Ελληνικά(希腊语)
Français(法语)
Italiano(意大利语)
Bahasa Indonesia(印度尼西亚语)
Magyar(匈牙利语)
Nederlands(荷兰语)
Norsk(挪威语)
Polski(波兰语)
Português(葡萄牙语 - 葡萄牙)
Português-Brasil(葡萄牙语 - 巴西)
Română(罗马尼亚语)
Русский(俄语)
Suomi(芬兰语)
Svenska(瑞典语)
Türkçe(土耳其语)
Tiếng Việt(越南语)
Українська(乌克兰语)
报告翻译问题
It's also 5m between "building footprint" dots (at right angles), that should help you confirm the larger ones.
So one square on the minimap is 2.5 x 2.5km. From Pythagoras' statement we get that the diagonal of the single square is ~3.53km.
Pythagoras statement: a^2+b^2=c^2
It's such extra help.
Actually, the map is 23,040 x 23,040 km... Using the gravel road, I measured the time it took to traverse the map, and the answer was 16 minutes. Given that the gravel road's top speed is 60 km/h and one minute equals one day, that works out to 60 km x 24 hours x 16 days = 23,040 km.
Map is hard coded as 20x20km. There is nothing to discus.
Tested using a 10m vs 32x32ft cube. You can also use forged's ruler mod to measure it.
https://steamcommunity.com/sharedfiles/filedetails/?id=2206650377
Jokes are difficult, eh?
On a totally unrelated note, with the arrival of aircraft, has there been any indication that we will have even larger maps in the future?